Taiwan is a thriving democracy, has a vibrant economy and offers its citizens universal health care. The nation sends young medical doctors to African nations such as Burkina Faso and Malawi to improve health standards. It even offers to send peacekeepers to the world's hot spots, if allowed.
In other words, Taiwan is eager to be an active member of the international community, yet it has been locked out of nearly all global organizations.
WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (
The nation is growing tired of such lame excuses, because, as almost everyone is aware, China is the real culprit behind Taiwan's international isolation.
To exclude the 23 million Taiwanese from the WHO, to deprive them of the universal rights to the prevention of and treatment of infectious disease in a global outbreak is simply morally wrong.
In 2003, when Taiwan was hit by SARS, the WHO initially refused to offer medical aid and vaccines to Taiwan. Taiwanese health authorities had to go to the Internet to search for information about SARS and more than 35 Taiwanese perished because of delays in treatment.
In effect, excluding Taiwan from the WHO will leave a hole in the global epidemic prevention network because bacteria and viruses know no boundaries.
It is not up to Chan to decide whether Taiwan is a nation or not: Under the criteria established in the 1933 Montevideo Convention, Taiwan is a sovereign state with effective control of a territory.
To sidestep the issue of sovereignty, Taiwan applied to become an observer at World Health Assembly as a health "entity" in 1997. For 10 consecutive years, however, because of opposition from China, its application has never even been put on the health assembly's agenda.
This year, the government decided to apply for entry to the WHO as a full member under the name Taiwan. WHO rules and regulations state that membership applications should be put on the agency's agenda and brought to the attention of member states. None of these steps were taken and the application was rejected before it ever had a chance.
To the great disappointment of the Taiwanese, the US government has refused to support Taiwan's full membership in the WHO, lamely citing its "one China" policy.
But let us go back to the basic principle of the WHO, which is "health for all." If a doctor refuses to treat a patient because of his or her political views, he or she will be censored by the medical board. By the same token it is unconscionable for the WHO and its member states to exclude Taiwan.
The universal right of the 23 million Taiwanese to the prevention and treatment of infectious disease is not and should not be a political issue, but a human rights and moral issue. Simply put, it is morally wrong to treat Taiwanese like second-class citizens.
Mei-chin van der Wees is a writer based in Washington.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly