Taiwan is a thriving democracy, has a vibrant economy and offers its citizens universal health care. The nation sends young medical doctors to African nations such as Burkina Faso and Malawi to improve health standards. It even offers to send peacekeepers to the world's hot spots, if allowed.
In other words, Taiwan is eager to be an active member of the international community, yet it has been locked out of nearly all global organizations.
WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (
The nation is growing tired of such lame excuses, because, as almost everyone is aware, China is the real culprit behind Taiwan's international isolation.
To exclude the 23 million Taiwanese from the WHO, to deprive them of the universal rights to the prevention of and treatment of infectious disease in a global outbreak is simply morally wrong.
In 2003, when Taiwan was hit by SARS, the WHO initially refused to offer medical aid and vaccines to Taiwan. Taiwanese health authorities had to go to the Internet to search for information about SARS and more than 35 Taiwanese perished because of delays in treatment.
In effect, excluding Taiwan from the WHO will leave a hole in the global epidemic prevention network because bacteria and viruses know no boundaries.
It is not up to Chan to decide whether Taiwan is a nation or not: Under the criteria established in the 1933 Montevideo Convention, Taiwan is a sovereign state with effective control of a territory.
To sidestep the issue of sovereignty, Taiwan applied to become an observer at World Health Assembly as a health "entity" in 1997. For 10 consecutive years, however, because of opposition from China, its application has never even been put on the health assembly's agenda.
This year, the government decided to apply for entry to the WHO as a full member under the name Taiwan. WHO rules and regulations state that membership applications should be put on the agency's agenda and brought to the attention of member states. None of these steps were taken and the application was rejected before it ever had a chance.
To the great disappointment of the Taiwanese, the US government has refused to support Taiwan's full membership in the WHO, lamely citing its "one China" policy.
But let us go back to the basic principle of the WHO, which is "health for all." If a doctor refuses to treat a patient because of his or her political views, he or she will be censored by the medical board. By the same token it is unconscionable for the WHO and its member states to exclude Taiwan.
The universal right of the 23 million Taiwanese to the prevention and treatment of infectious disease is not and should not be a political issue, but a human rights and moral issue. Simply put, it is morally wrong to treat Taiwanese like second-class citizens.
Mei-chin van der Wees is a writer based in Washington.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS