Sunday saw the conclusion of the latest cross-strait forum held in Beijing between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
The forum came just days after the nation's 11th attempt to gain admission to the WHO was rejected because of China's interference.
It also came as China last week -- once again -- tried to deny Taiwan's sovereignty by making it the first leg of the "domestic route" for the torch in the build-up to next year's Beijing Olympics.
And it comes after seven years of Chinese authorities ignoring the democratic government of Taiwan.
That China has almost 1,000 ballistic missiles pointing at their homeland didn't seem to bother the delegates from Taiwan in the least.
These are the same KMT and People First Party lawmakers who swore allegiance to the Republic of China and vowed to uphold its integrity, but stand there like dummies while Chinese leaders denigrate the nation and treat them like provincial delegates.
That these people do not represent the government of Taiwan and have no authority to discuss and seal such deals didn't seem to take anything away from the occasion.
Lien and his friends could return to Taiwan with a few more meaningless economic concessions from their "friends" across the Strait, but the few crumbs that Beijing has thrown at them are just the latest chapter in China's "united front" strategy that aims to suck the life out of Taiwan's economic autonomy until the nation -- and its independence -- is swallowed up by its neighbor.
All the measures are designed to do is prevent Taiwan's dynamic business sector from reaching out further around the globe, help China secure even more of Taiwan's investment capital and steal Taiwan's know-how and intellectual property.
We have already seen an example with the fruit exports that the KMT agreed on with China during one of its trips. Not long after the first batches of Taiwanese fruit arrived in China, the Chinese market was swamped with low-quality fakes and imitations -- all claiming to be from Taiwan -- hurting the revenues and reputation of Taiwanese farmers.
The behavior of the opposition since Lien's first trip to China in 2005 has been a thorn in the side of the government. But it is particularly hard to know how to deal with legislators who participate in subversive activity and deal directly with the government of a hostile state.
Jailing them or revoking passports would lead the former political prisoners and democracy activists in the Democratic Progressive Party into a domestic conflict for which they are ill-prepared.
The best we can ultimately hope for in a democracy is that the electorate will see through the faux loyalty of these opportunists and punish those who block important legislative matters at home to cosy up to a regime of autocrats.
One of the great hopes for the new legislative electoral system is that it will help dispose of some of the flotsam that pose as legislators.
In order to facilitate this, the names of the 30 lawmakers who attended the forum and those who visit China on a regular basis should be publicized so that the electorate can make a clear and informed choice between legislators who are proud to represent Taiwan and those who are more interested in singing the praises of China.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS