The end of April approaches and the newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Po-hsiung (
This has always been the characteristic anomaly of the KMT -- a party that claims to be interested in Taiwan but consistently snubs localization. One has the feeling that the KMT's preferential attitude and mindset remains that "If it is good for the PRC, then it is good for Taiwan."
Wu of course only recently got the job as chairman because former chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Yes, pseudo Mr. Clean Ma is now on trial. We all remember him because in true double standard fashion, with faulty logic thrown in to boot, Ma was the one who insisted that President Chen Shui-bian (
And now that Ma has been indicted, he decides to make a run for the presidency.
However, let us return to Wu, who is following the lead of other pan-blue camp leaders like former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to cross the Taiwan Strait to find out what is good for Taiwan.
There is a tremendous irony involved here. Does anyone remember Sun Yat-sen (
He is that distinguished person whose picture adorns most government offices here and who is also allegedly revered in China.
Sun is most known for preaching the Three Principles of the People -- democracy, nationalism and livelihood. Remember those?
It is almost 100 years since Sun began touting those principles, so it is all the more ironic that those who profess to honor Sun are the very ones who have resisted putting those principles into practice. Democracy came to Taiwan not because of the KMT, but in spite of it. Democracy has still not come to the PRC.
The last prediction was that it might come after another 100 years. A more blunt way of saying it is: "Sun's principles of democracy are fine and should be adopted, but not while we are in power."
So Wu will head to China to find out what is good for Taiwan. Remember when Lien and Soong made their pilgrimages back to their (not Taiwan's) motherland? Sun's words about democracy, nationalism and livelihood were strictly taboo, verboten, mention-at-risk-of-getting-kicked-out.
If I were a betting man, I would lay heavy odds that while Wu may bow to some pictures of Sun, he won't dare to mention Sun's principles of democracy.
And Sun? He must be twisting and turning in his grave.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS