President Chen Shui-bian (
The WHO charter stipulates that membership is open to all countries, not just those in the UN. For Chen to use his position as head of state and representative of Taiwan's 23 million people to apply for membership is an extremely important first step in the nation's bid to join the WHO. Not only does it highlight that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation, but it also makes it clear that Taiwan wants to participate fully in the WHO, and that it is willing and determined to contribute to improving the health of all the world's people.
In consideration of its fundamental and long-term interests, this is the correct course for Taiwan to pursue. This is not the same as applying to be an observer in the World Health Assembly (WHA), which is a sub-organization of the WHO. The benefits of applying to be a full WHO member are far greater than becoming a WHA observer.
Official WHO members enjoy full rights within the organization, whereas observers are more like an audience in a meeting whose participation is greatly limited. Only official members have the right to make proposals, speak and participate. Only they have the right to vote on WHO policies and initiatives, or have people elected to important positions.
All WHO members are countries, whereas that is not necessarily true of observers. Fighting for an observer spot could easily mislead the international community into thinking that Taiwan is not an independent and sovereign nation.
As all this shows, WHO membership is open to all countries. Applicants need a simple majority of votes from WHO members to gain entrance, the same as those applying for WHA observer status. In terms of procedural difficulties, applying to the WHO is no more difficult than applying to the WHA.
Taiwan's biggest obstacle is Chinese opposition. In the past 10 years, Taiwan has humbled itself by applying for observer status in the WHA in order to avoid controversy over its sovereignty dispute with China. Beijing, however, has not responded positively, instead continuing to arrogantly insist Taiwan is a part of China and is not qualified to become a WHO member or WHA observer.
But international law and the plain facts show that Taiwan and China are two unconnected countries, each with its own jurisdiction. Therefore Taiwan wants to apply for WHO membership as a sovereign nation, not for WHA observer status as a "health entity."
In the past we sought to become WHA observers, but we have now entered a new stage of actively pursuing full WHO membership. As long as we choose the right direction, and people work closely together with the government with trust and resolve, our shared determination will see us through to success.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the New Century Foundation and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US