By definition, demonstrating in support of a dictator is demonstrating against democracy.
Earlier this month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) faithful, including former chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), took to the streets to demonstrate on behalf of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), accusing the pan-green camp of "rewriting history."
It should be no surprise the KMT faithful have adopted this weak and cowardly attitude. Once again the KMT has taken the embarrassing position of avidly supporting tyranny.
Instead of parading in the streets to apologize for decades of oppression, seeking the people's forgiveness and supporting their nation, Taiwan, the KMT leadership and their supporters paraded with fists raised to show their love for a dictator and their beloved Republic of China (ROC), whatever that is.
What the unwitting faithful did not realize is that by so doing, they marched on behalf of China, glorifying its tyranny, oppression, lack of human and civil rights and, more than anything, its form of dictatorship, which allows for no dissent, especially from those pesky pro-independence supporters.
With wistful tears in their eyes while dreaming of the "mainland" and their loss of power, many KMT faithful rue the day democracy was allowed to take root in Taiwan and yearn for the good old days when nary a "splittest" was allowed to breathe, much less be president. They want a return to the days when elections, just like in China, were about appointing the next heir to the throne.
The protest to celebrate Chiang and the ROC is an embarrassing example of just how little the KMT has actually changed since the days of the White Terror and martial law. It should serve as a huge wake-up call to Taiwanese as they approach the legislative and presidential elections.
Listening to the bullhorns and beating drums and watching the waving KMT flags and raised fists, I could not help feel embarrassed there are still people who actually embrace dictatorship and dictators.
I felt disgusted and I can only hope that the bulk of Taiwanese wake up and understand just what the KMT and Ma are offering to them ... slavery, oppression, fear, one-party rule and the annihilation of everything Taiwanese.
No separate language, no separate culture, nothing separate from China and likely the attempted rewriting of history. Having lost the civil war 60 years ago, the only way left for the KMT is the path of intrigue and subterfuge, betrayal and, most of all, rewriting history to glorify a past riddled with death and terrible oppression.
After seven years of opposing every effort to help Taiwan improve its quality of life and economic security, and, more importantly, opposing every single effort to defend Taiwan, the KMT and its tiny accomplice, the People First Party (PFP), are whipping their faithful into a "patriotic" frenzy with wistful tales of great generals and the purported success of foreign occupation. This rewriting of history leaves out the summary and secret executions, the brutal theft of a country's assets and the stubborn refusal to give back what was stolen from the people.
In reality, what the KMT is offering Taiwan is a dictatorship, with one-party rule. The KMT is focused on making a life in China, where all the streets are supposedly paved with gold and all the businessmen are rich, where the biggest market offers the biggest opportunities and where one day the treasure that is Taiwan can be taken over, looted and stolen.
In the dark rooms of the KMT headquarters, in the secret meetings of leaders and hopefuls, beyond earshot, plans are probably being made in accord with promises likely already given to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Power tastes so good, it is hard to lose forever. The trouble is, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
And when the KMT faithful -- yearning for the good old days when they ran everything, when their personal corruption was law, when their profiteering was legend and when the "locals" were overrun -- open their eyes one morning, they will see a raped and burned Taiwan, bereft of its industry, its technology, its resources, its financial power, its economy and also bereft of its freedom, independence, human rights and democracy.
Sooner or later, they will also find themselves, a troublesome little bug of a party, in the cross-hairs of Hu and the CCP, perhaps hiding in the same foxhole as those "pesky splittests" -- for in any dictatorship, there is only room for one dictator.
One day hopefully the KMT will wake up and realize that true history cannot be rewritten, because it is carried in the hearts and minds of free people.
Lee Long-hwa
United States
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS