An article entitled Sovereignty is the basis of economy written by The Taiwan Association of University Vice Chairmen Michael Tai (戴正德) was published in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper) on March 10. In it, Tai says that if the Taiwanese people place economic development before national sovereignty and independence, Taiwan's economy will lack foundation. He also reminds us that economic development requires national sovereignty and independence.
Unfortunately, the private-sector negotiations with China concerning weekend cross-strait charter flights, Chinese yuan exchanges and allowing Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan are actually detrimental to Taiwan.
To meet the requests of Taiwanese businesspeople investing in China and the domestic tourism industry, the government is equating "guaranteeing" sovereignty with "delaying" sovereignty and deceiving the public by entrusting the private sector with the negotiations. It is thus selling out the sovereignty of Taiwan while being trapped by Beijing's talk of Taiwan being a domestic Chinese matter.
Hopefully, the government will consider Taiwan and understand the profound meaning of Tai's words before it is too late.
The weekend flights and the currency exchange plan can hardly be seen as part of economic development. Although such flights will save time for businesspeople in Taiwan, it will also increase investment and tourism expenditure for businesspeople and the public.
According to a survey by the Chinese National Federation of Industries, opening cross-strait links will lead to an annual increase in Chinese-bound investment of almost NT$300 billion (US$9 billion). While a survey conducted by the Mainland Affairs Council shows that Taiwanese tourists traveling to China would increase by about 1.6 times, with an increase in expenditure of NT$70 billion, while spending by Chinese tourists in Taiwan is estimated to reach NT$25 billion.
A quick calculation suggests that Taiwan will suffer a net outflow of at least NT$345 billion per year if the plans are approved.
In addition to paying attention to the principle that economic development requires national sovereignty and independence, it is necessary to gain an in-depth understanding of the significance of economic autonomy and development when pursuing sovereignty and independence.
When Taiwan's capital and resources gradually shrink because of the opening of cross-strait links and deregulating banking investments in China, China's attraction will become stronger. By that time, any measure aimed at improving the domestic investment environment will be ineffective. Officially allowing trade in the Chinese yuan will cause it to gradually replace the New Taiwan Dollar and unhindered cross-strait trade will give it the status of a semi-national currency.
The "Three Yesses" -- yes to the pursuit of independence, name change and a new constitution -- will become an empty slogan. Economy feeds sovereignty, and when sovereignty no longer gets the nutrition it needs, it will wither and die.
Taiwan's economic foundation remains good. As long as the government protects our sovereignty and does not lift the bans on cross-strait links, China-bound investments by local banks and high-tech industry, the investment ceiling and circulation of the yuan which represents Chinese sovereignty before Beijing recognizes Taiwan's sovereignty, the fourth "Yes" -- the pursuit of economic development -- will follow automatically. This in time will lead to a change in the national title, a new constitution and normalization of Taiwan's national status.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS