The spat this week between the Tourism Bureau and the Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) over advertising revenue proves wrong anyone who thought tourism bureaucrats in this country couldn't get any more inept.
The THSRC is refusing to provide the bureau with advertising space at a nominal fee and the bureau has retaliated by turning to the out-of-favor Taiwan Railway Administration to further its policy goals.
This stupidity showers neither organization with glory.
Nevertheless, for those whose conception of tourism does not extend beyond the fleecing of gullible Chinese, the spat may not be so disturbing. The high speed rail does not direct cash into the hands of bus, airplane and resort operators, who are among the most vocal backers of a change in cross-strait policy.
The Chen administration is spending enormous amounts of time and political capital on opening up tourism to a much larger number of Chinese tourists. Notwithstanding the bluster coming from some pan-green-camp politicians, there is little to be concerned about in terms of political or security considerations given how many "China shills" Taiwan produces without Beijing's prodding.
The bigger and more important question is why the tourism industry is so eager to secure the Chinese tourist dollar -- apparently at the expense of the rest of the world's travelers.
The answer is not very pleasant: Taiwan's tourism chiefs and entrepreneurs are lazy and incompetent and have filled the country with substandard facilities and poorly trained, monolingual staff.
Chinese tourists, accustomed to this laziness and incompetence -- and worse -- at home, will pose no problem for travel agencies except in demanding refunds from the most conspicuously shoddy operators.
The fact is that Taiwan has so much to offer to tourists from the rest of the world -- but the message is not getting through. Insufficient cash for overseas promotional work can be blamed, but only to a point.
There are other things that the government can and should do to destroy the absurd assumption that a larger Chinese market is going to make Taiwan more tourist-friendly.
One is to make visas free and extend them to three months (as with Hong Kong) for nationals of countries that pose no direct security threat to Taiwan.
Martial law finished 20 years ago; there are no good reasons to make tourists jump through hoops that simply exist to make Taiwan's overseas officers seem more important than they really are.
Another is that tourism authorities should employ more fluent and competent speakers of English and Japanese to buttress their multilingual resources. The omnipresence of Chinglish in major tourism centers, particularly outside of Taipei City, is acutely embarrassing for the nation. It also inconveniences tourists as they make their way around the country, though, as far as can be made out, no one in government seems to think this is an issue of concern.
Tourism is about more than lining the pockets of individual operators. It's about selling ideas and presenting the nation in a certain way to mobile (and therefore more influential) foreigners. Until such time that the government takes upgrading tourism seriously, the ideas that will be presented to foreign visitors, including Chinese, will have a nasty, provincial flavor.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS