As next year's presidential election approaches, the nation's two biggest political parties are faced with the difficult task of having to select tickets that would give them the greatest chance of winning the presidency.
The importance of the upcoming presidential election for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is without question.
For the DPP, winning this election will help salvage the party from the past year's slump, during which its top figures, including President Chen Shui-bian (
As for the KMT, after losing the previous two presidential elections, it cannot wait to reclaim the presidency and enjoy the sweet taste of political victory.
Both parties have mechanisms for the primaries through which -- in theory at least -- the best candidates will be elected through a combination of ballots cast by party members and public opinion polls. While this process seems straightforward and in conformity with the fundamentals of democracy, it has some fatal flaws.
This explains why, before the primaries have even been held, both parties have decided to resort to negotiations among the contenders to decide who should be nominated. The biggest flaw in that approach is that the attendant party infighting could split them.
When it comes to the consequences of such splits, the KMT probably has the most painful experience -- notably the 2000 presidential election. The KMT's votes were divided between the party's nominated candidate -- Lien Chan (
Life, however, has its many ironies. In light of the standoff between former KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Although Wang has more seniority than Ma in the party, Ma's popularity made it almost certain that he would be chosen to represent the party. However, the scales began to tip in Wang's favor after Ma was formally indicted on embezzlement charges.
While Ma's popularity remains high, it is not unlikely that he will be convicted on those charges, which could have serious repercussions for the KMT's image. Hence Wang's determination to run as presidential candidate and nothing else.
Under such extraordinary circumstances, Lien and Wu Po-hsiung (
Given his political stature, it is highly unlikely Lien would settle for anything less than the presidency. However, Ma's unwillingness to be Wang's sidekick probably also applies to Lien.
It seems that in the weeks ahead the KMT will need to accomplish no less than squaring the circle.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS