I first met Wang Ping-yun (汪平雲, Vincent Wang) in 2002, while preparing the English translation of the Executive Yuan's White Paper on Human Rights. Our friendship blossomed as we worked together on the "human rights act" (人權法) drafting process. His was the clearest voice in a grueling set of meetings of the drafting subcommittee set up under the Executive Yuan Human Rights Promotion Committee, and he was the most important counterpart for the team of international experts we brought in from the International Commission of Jurists.
From these experiences, I learned how dedicated he was to the true calling of the law -- that it should be an effective shield to protect the people against justice. He never thought of it as merely a mechanism for resolving disputes, much less as a political tool. In that sense, it is unfortunate that he was sometimes described as a "green camp lawyer." As far as I could see, everything he did was for the good of the whole country, especially for the institutions of the law itself, and not for a particular party or politician.
He carried out his mission with the full power of his intellect and tireless effort -- he was perpetually overworked, constantly busy with a bewildering array of projects, each of major national significance. One of the most amazing things about him was that, despite this crushing workload, he was always very considerate, never complaining or taking out his frustrations (and many there were, since the pace of the major reforms he was working on was never fast enough) on the people around him.
I last saw Ping-yun a couple of weeks before he passed away, when we had lunch together. The original purpose of the meeting was that he wanted to tell me about the latest developments with the human rights act (to be transformed into the human rights section of the new constitution), and to share the news about two new pieces of legislation: the implementing act for the International Bill of Rights (國際人權法典) -- the two Covenants still awaiting ratification in the legislature -- as well as the draft refugee law (難民法). He said he hoped very much that, among the various human rights "infrastructure projects" that remain unfinished, at least these two laws could be passed this year.
Luckily for me, he had some time that day, and we ended up having a wide-ranging discussion on a range of issues. We got into a debate about the constitutional interpretation for the "state affairs fund" case. Of course I lost the argument on legal grounds -- being up against one of the brightest legal minds in the country -- but I saw again how he was acting in defense of the Constitution itself, that he felt compelled to do so.
I think the most appropriate way to commemorate Ping-yun is to redouble our efforts to complete his work to achieve some of the major reforms he was planning. In particular, he would be pleased if we could get the ratification of the international bill of rights and its implementation act, as well as the refugee law, enacted this year. Of course, he wouldn't have been satisfied with that alone; he would always have kept striving towards the ideal state of the rule of law. We can honor his memory best by doing the same.
Bo Tedards is a political commentator based in Taipei.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS