The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) once again demonstrated how seriously out of step it is when it announced on Friday that it was revoking the party membership of Minister of National Defense Lee Jye (
The KMT's Evaluation and Discipline Committee said that Lee was kicked out of the party for "fawning" over the Democratic Progressive Party government, but in the same press release revealed the real reason for Lee's expulsion: he had disrespected late dictator and party icon Chiang Kai-shek (
This came just days after Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
These two episodes highlight the problems faced by a party stuck in the past and remind us how a party that cannot break free from the shackles of its authoritarian history is unfit to lead Taiwan.
The KMT's failure to change and come to terms with democratization and the growth of a Taiwan consciousness will continue to hold it back.
How can the people of Taiwan be expected to take the KMT seriously if, almost six decades after being defeated in the Chinese Civil War, it still refuses to relinquish its claim to be the legitimate government of China and concentrate its efforts on Taiwan?
The KMT's strict adherence to the Confucian concepts of loyalty and respect mean it remains unable to deal properly with embarrassing episodes from its past.
And while loyalty and respect are worthy concepts, they are sometimes incompatible with the requirements of modern democratic politics.
Loyalty to senior party figures is why the KMT cannot completely close the door on the Chiang era and also why it let former chairman Lien Chan (
But worst of all, it is the KMT's underlying Chinese supremacist attitude that has seen it struggle to cope with the rapid changes occurring in society.
Look at how the party undid all the good work of former president and party chairman Lee Teng-hui (
This attitude is also why the party will almost certainly select former chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Wang is Taiwanese, and the KMT would be loath to give him the chance to lead the nation because of the lingering memories of Lee's "betrayal" of the party.
While the KMT talks about caring for Taiwan and expresses regret over the 228 Incident, the party's dogmatic devotion to a flawed history, refusal to accept criticism of Chiang and reluctance to commit itself wholeheartedly to this nation's future create a different impression.
It is this stubbornness that will continue to harm the KMT in the eyes of the electorate. And for this it has only itself to blame.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS