The preparations for next year's presidential election have entered the nomination stage. The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) internal mechanism and the competition between its various candidates seem to be running smoother than that of other parties. If the nomination process is mishandled, however, it could result in infighting, which would be very bad for the party.
This is why the big parties with established mechanisms follow these mechanisms -- unless there is sufficient reason for altering them.
To allow the indicted former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
This gives the public a clear insight into the party. That the KMT, which boasts of having a wealth of talented people, seems to think that life without Ma is impossible, is risible.
The DPP's big four -- Vice President Annette Lu (
There is only one president and one vice president and not two of each. This explains why it is so important for the DPP to act as one. Even if the four split into two tickets for the primaries, they must perform as one united ruling team when in government.
While the contenders vie for publicity during the nomination process, they should do so with respect for their competitors. That is, they should focus on presenting their arguments in a positive manner rather than denigrating their opponents as a way to demonstrate that there is no bad blood between them and that they will continue to work together in future.
But more importantly, the president has to assume more responsibility and therefore the candidates running for the DPP's presidential nomination should be held to even higher standards.
Democratization and localization processes feed upon one another, but for historical reasons, the nation's sovereignty is still incomplete. The first thing that the next president should do, therefore, is uphold and promote Taiwanese consciousness.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (
A few years ago President Chen Shui-bian (
The next president should also present his or her specific goals.
Following the DPP's ascension to power in 2000, the pan-blue camp has adopted a scorched earth policy toward its opponent. Last year, former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) even organized a campaign aimed at ousting Chen from office.
On the international scene, China has worked so hard to isolate Taiwan that even Washington, wary of offending Beijing, has been critical of Taipei. The nation's future president must be able to resist pressure and persevere. Although the strategies adopted may be flexible, the president's reform goals must be crystal-clear and adherence to the sovereignty principle should be unwavering.
Because of the nation's national identity crisis, internal problems and ethnic differences, party and national unity will be difficult to achieve. The future president will therefore need to be receptive to and tolerant of differing opinions
Paul Lin is a political commentator in Taipei.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS