The Chinese-language Next Magazine created quite a sensation last week when it ran a front-page headline reading "[Former president Lee Teng-hui (
But in what respect has Lee abandoned Taiwanese independence? We must first discuss what the true meaning and practical implications of "Taiwanese independence" really is before we can make a fair and objective appraisal of Lee's remarks. The most imposing challenge to Taiwanese independence comes from China.
So -- even though in practical terms Taiwan is a country with its own government, territory, citizenry and sovereignty -- it cannot normalize its status and earn recognition in the international community. And because it lacks recognition from the rest of the world, Taiwan is not a "normal" country. Therefore, the most fundamental meaning of "Taiwanese independence" is the need to distinguish that Taiwan is not China.
Based on this principle, we have constantly declared to the international community that there are two separate countries on each side of the Taiwan Strait and each year we knock on the door of the UN. Domestically, we have been striving toward the goals of creating a new constitution and changing the nation's official title.
As Lee says, "We should stop talking about Taiwanese independence." Instead, we should take concrete steps to realize the goal of normalizing our country by applying to join the UN, amending the nation's title and writing a new constitution. There are two strategies for Taiwan to follow in pursuing these goals.
First, the concept of "Taiwanese independence" could logically make people assume that Taiwan is a part of China, that certain factors have led Taiwan to advocate seceding from China but that China will not allow it to do so.
Viewed from this angle, talking about Taiwanese independence falls into the dangerous logic of treating Taiwan as a part of China, which is just what China wants. But if we switch up the terminology and say that we want to realize Taiwanese independence by turning Taiwan into a "normalized country," not only is this a more accurate description of the situation, but it also helps us avoid adopting dangerously muddled logic. In the past few years, haven't Taiwanese grown accustomed to using the phrase "striving toward becoming a normal country?"
Second, in order to prevent domestic and international disturbances from blocking Taiwan on its path to normalization, it's best to just "do" Taiwanese independence rather than talk about it. This has been the pan-green camp's unspoken common understanding for many years and the reason why -- for more than a decade -- we have been taking concrete steps such as applying to the UN and talking about transitional justice, amending the national name and creating a new constitution. Aren't all of these real, practical efforts embarked on with an eye to tangibly realizing Taiwanese independence?
Taiwan Advocates and the Formosan Association for Public Affairs will hold an event on the difficulties and breakthroughs in the creation of a new constitution on March 4. Isn't this symbolic of the combined efforts of Taiwanese both at home and abroad to realize Taiwanese independence?
So how exactly has Lee abandoned Taiwanese independence?
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
Translated by Marc Langer
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,