If former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
But Ma argues an intriguing case: How can he be indicted for corruption for transferring public funds to his private account when so many senior politicians around him are seemingly far more deserving of prosecution on these and many other terms?
The point is interesting for two reasons. It shines a bright light on an entrenched culture of graft in the nation's bureaucracies, and it shows that Ma thinks there is such a thing as relative graft -- in his own case, he would argue, any "graft" should be blamed on the system and not his squeaky-clean self.
A lot of people are sympathetic to this point of view. Taiwan is a country, after all, that has become wealthy and free in a context of compromise and pragmatism. This nation's inglorious culture of administrative graft and perks is so familiar and inoffensive that even some pan-green-camp moderates will be privately scratching their heads at how Ma could end up being indicted when political parties are filled to the brim with people whose decades of wealth accumulation -- far greater than the paltry amount Ma is accused of embezzling -- would struggle to stand up to rigorous investigation.
The KMT itself, up until recently, was a wealth magnet in which those who knew how to play the game could make immense amounts of money. As party chairman, Ma was its protector, and while he protests his innocence on a personal level, it should be made clear that Ma did nothing to hold the party accountable to the nation for its decades of theft of public and private property.
Ma's public image is enhanced by rank stupidity from senior Democratic Progressive Party officials who ought to know better. Caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (
Ma's language also appears more moderate against the pitiful huffing and puffing of KMT hacks such as caucus whip Tseng Yung-chuan (
A more considered assessment of Tuesday's events comes from political scientist June Teufel Dreyer, who summed up Ma's response with the word "cunning."
Cunning, indeed. There is a strong case that Ma's tribulations will have hurt his presidential chances: Enemies in the KMT will try to make hay out of his misfortune, and moderate voters in both camps may now be experiencing second thoughts about the man international news agencies love to call "handsome." But Ma has pre-empted party enemies -- the terminally evasive Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
The idea peddled by some wire agencies that Ma has suffered a "fatal blow" is utter nonsense. His eyes are now firmly and publicly on the presidency, and his first priority is to secure the KMT nomination. This is not a done deal, but if Tuesday's events have taught us anything, it is that Ma is now, finally, spoiling for a fight. The handsome effete has been blooded, and his pan-blue-camp supporters are still standing by his side: Let the presidential campaign begin.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS