Speculation was rife in the media last week that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
If Ma is indicted, expect to see the pan-blue camp lash out at the judiciary and government in equal measure.
But closer examination of events reveals that it is the KMT and the People First Party, its pan-blue ally, that will be to blame if their best hope of winning next March's presidential election finds himself in court and his long-standing reputation for integrity under a cloud.
After all, it is the irrational actions of the pan-blue camp's lawmakers that have brought Ma to the verge of electoral ruin, as their behavior since he assumed the KMT chairmanship in August 2005 has systematically eroded his long-held image of infallibility.
For more than a year Ma has been promoting his idea of a "reasonable arms purchase" in an attempt to break the legislative gridlock over the procurement of US arms, but his party caucus has either not been listening or just choosing to ignore him, meaning that the passage of any kind of arms deal is still a long way off. This has put Taiwan's relationship with the US -- something the KMT disingenuously says it values -- under increasing stress, damaging Ma domestically and causing him trouble during last March's US trip.
Then, last April, when Ma asked KMT legislators to support Hsieh Wen-ding's (
Next, under pressure last fall from deep-blue elements within his own camp, Ma let himself be press-ganged into giving free rein to Shih Ming-teh's (
Ma has also been unable to deliver on numerous promises to lead an opposition party that would work with the government to benefit all people. The KMT caucus has continued blocking legislation left, right and center, giving Ma the appearance of a party leader who has no control over his party.
And don't forget it was the pan-blue camp's ceaseless and frenzied attempts to harm the standing of President Chen Shui-bian (
If Ma is indicted, whether or not he is found innocent will be irrelevant, as images of him arriving at court will be enough to knock him off his pedestal, placing him on the same level as every other compromised politician.
The air of infallibility will be gone, along with -- to quote the KMT -- their best chance of "winning back" Taiwan.
Faced with a growing "Taiwan consciousness" and the localization efforts of Chen's administration, the KMT and pro-China lobby in their bid for relevance have behaved like a drowning man whose desperate struggles drown both himself and his rescuer.
The KMT, like any party, has internal divisions and there are many within its ranks that are hostile to Ma and his moderate, please everyone style.
But without Ma, does the party have any other candidates capable of securing enough votes for victory in next year's presidential election?
With talk of bringing back former chairman Lien Chan (
And now it is too late to turn back the clock.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the