Presidential Office Secretary-General Chiou I-jen (
To create the required conditions for such a solution, we should build a consensus on national identity, while on the other hand breaking free from the international community's unfair and absurd stance. If we can reach a certain level of consensus on the national identity issue, the international community's absurdity would be further highlighted, which might make it easier to create a breakthrough.
In the past, the dispute over Taiwan's national identity has been stuck in the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) independence-unification trap. This trap is built on a faulty premise: Taiwan is part of China. It is this erroneous premise that creates the issue of Taiwan's independence from or unification with China.
If we want to build consensus on the national identity issue, this faulty premise must be replaced with two questions.
The first question to ask is whether or not Taiwan is a part of China, or the People's Republic of China (PRC). In the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, which officially ended World War II, Japan only renounced its sovereignty over Taiwan, but it was not specified who that sovereignty should pass to -- China or the ROC. Given this fact, the Taiwanese people should at least be able to reach a minimal consensus: based on both legal principles and reality, neither China nor the ROC has sovereignty over Taiwan.
The second question to be asked is whether Taiwan is an independent nation. If Taiwan's political parties and politicians do not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, then how are they qualified to run for president or vice president?
If we can agree that Taiwan is a sovereign state and not part of China, then the issue of the nation's title becomes a bit more flexible. The campaign to correct Taiwan's national title may still be an emotional issue, but more important is the fact that China insists that the ROC has been succeeded by the PRC; as a result the ROC does not exist and is not recognized in the international community.
Whether based on legal principles or reality, the PRC has no sovereignty over Taiwan. What the PRC does have is the power to isolate Taiwan internationally in its deceitful attempts to "inherit" sovereignty over Taiwan.
The US, which directed the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan, knows very well that China has no legal claim over Taiwan but still gives in to China's blackmail. It also disregards democratic principles and demands that Taiwan not change its national title, thus placing Taiwan in an impossible situation.
Taiwan's current status is that of a sovereign and independent nation and the international community is to blame for not recognizing this fact. On the international front, Taiwan must highlight the international community's mistaken, contradictory and absurd stance.
If the US believes that maintaining the cross-strait status quo is conducive to stability, then it should recognize Taiwan's current national title. If it doesn't, Taiwan will have no choice but to create a new constitution and correct the national title in order to be able to break from the isolation created by the "two noes" and avoid being annexed by China.
Shen Chieh is a journalist based in the US. Translated by Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS