Presidential Office Secretary-General Chiou I-jen (
To create the required conditions for such a solution, we should build a consensus on national identity, while on the other hand breaking free from the international community's unfair and absurd stance. If we can reach a certain level of consensus on the national identity issue, the international community's absurdity would be further highlighted, which might make it easier to create a breakthrough.
In the past, the dispute over Taiwan's national identity has been stuck in the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) independence-unification trap. This trap is built on a faulty premise: Taiwan is part of China. It is this erroneous premise that creates the issue of Taiwan's independence from or unification with China.
If we want to build consensus on the national identity issue, this faulty premise must be replaced with two questions.
The first question to ask is whether or not Taiwan is a part of China, or the People's Republic of China (PRC). In the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, which officially ended World War II, Japan only renounced its sovereignty over Taiwan, but it was not specified who that sovereignty should pass to -- China or the ROC. Given this fact, the Taiwanese people should at least be able to reach a minimal consensus: based on both legal principles and reality, neither China nor the ROC has sovereignty over Taiwan.
The second question to be asked is whether Taiwan is an independent nation. If Taiwan's political parties and politicians do not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, then how are they qualified to run for president or vice president?
If we can agree that Taiwan is a sovereign state and not part of China, then the issue of the nation's title becomes a bit more flexible. The campaign to correct Taiwan's national title may still be an emotional issue, but more important is the fact that China insists that the ROC has been succeeded by the PRC; as a result the ROC does not exist and is not recognized in the international community.
Whether based on legal principles or reality, the PRC has no sovereignty over Taiwan. What the PRC does have is the power to isolate Taiwan internationally in its deceitful attempts to "inherit" sovereignty over Taiwan.
The US, which directed the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan, knows very well that China has no legal claim over Taiwan but still gives in to China's blackmail. It also disregards democratic principles and demands that Taiwan not change its national title, thus placing Taiwan in an impossible situation.
Taiwan's current status is that of a sovereign and independent nation and the international community is to blame for not recognizing this fact. On the international front, Taiwan must highlight the international community's mistaken, contradictory and absurd stance.
If the US believes that maintaining the cross-strait status quo is conducive to stability, then it should recognize Taiwan's current national title. If it doesn't, Taiwan will have no choice but to create a new constitution and correct the national title in order to be able to break from the isolation created by the "two noes" and avoid being annexed by China.
Shen Chieh is a journalist based in the US. Translated by Lin Ya-ti
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS