People who fancy riddles and puzzles should delight in attempting to unravel the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) sale of the Broadcasting Corporation of China (BCC).
The BCC was sold by the KMT on Dec. 24, 2005, to China Times Group subsidiary Jungli Investment Co (
The KMT sealed the deal -- reportedly worth NT$9.3 billion (US$281.6 million) -- just one day before the deadline for political parties and the military to dispose of their media assets.
Then, as critics of the KMT panned the party over the lack of transparency in the deal, the news broke last month that former UFO Radio president Jaw Shaw-kong (
Jaw's acquisition of BCC raises the question as to why he would buy the controlling stake of the broadcasting firm from Hua Hsia and not from the BCC's owner, Jungli Investment Co.
BCC vice president Lee Chien-jung (
The dubious relations between Jungli Investment Co and Hua Hsia Investment Holding Co has led many to question whether the two companies and the KMT are still one big family after all.
If this is true, the KMT has broken its promise to pull out of the media industry.
And the fun continues.
Earlier this week, two Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers revealed that the presidents of the four companies that now own BCC all have links to the UFO Network, which is owned by Jaw. While Jaw insisted that the purchase had been carried out in accordance with the law, the news nonetheless raised many eyebrows.
The BCC has refused to shed light on the financial details of the deal, as have Jaw and the KMT.
The furtive behavior of all parties involved in the deal makes one wonder what it is they are trying to hide.
If the whole deal exists in name only, then the KMT has obviously violated the Radio and Television Act (
When KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
If he wants to win the trust of Taiwanese and prove that he is true to his word, it is not too late for him to step forward and explain the financial transaction surrounding the sale of the KMT's three media outlets -- and Jaw's purchase of the BCC -- in detail.
The more one attempts to solve this conundrum, the more questions arise. Meanwhile, the National Communications Commission (NCC) sits idle, failing to uphold its already compromised responsibility of maintaining order in the broadcasting industry.
The NCC should get its act together and examine the details of the BCC deal, which involves issues that pertain to the management of the media, concentration of shares and government-owned radio frequencies.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS