President Chen Shui-bian's (
Odd as it may seem, Chen should be congratulated for this. Beset by government agencies and an opposition that refuse to reform the pallid images that pass off as national symbols, most Taiwanese have dismissed national identity as worthy of discussion.
Yet Chen is spot on -- and, for once, eloquent -- when he says: "We only have two choices. Either we sit still and wait for death, or we reach out spontaneously and show the world that Taiwan exists."
Taiwan's diplomatic dilemma is spiced up by a paradox -- rarely discussed -- that helps students of politics appreciate the meaning of realpolitik.
During the 1980s, under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Taiwan's allies were a who's who of rightist, military and/or racist autocracies or near-failed states that China wouldn't touch. Somoza's Nicaragua was one, along with Liberia, South Africa, South Korea and other brutal administrations.
Ironically, Taiwan's democratization came more or less in tandem with China's final, comprehensive trashing of the egalitarian principles that energized its people and that were used to justify a "proletarian" dictatorship -- and which attracted support from leftist governments around the world.
As Taiwan's formerly repressive allies became more democratic, they turned their backs on a democratizing Taiwan to open their doors to an enduringly repressive China. Having already made the switch to China in 1985 and then back to Taiwan in 1990 in step with its electoral cycle, Nicaragua would appear to be the latest of these, regardless of Chen's appearance at Nicaraguan president-elect Daniel Ortega's inauguration and any private sympathy Ortega himself might have for the Taiwanese.
Trying to convince Ortega and his party to stick by Taiwan is a tall order. As with other allies who have demonstrated their financial, commercial or ideological inclination toward China, a leftist Nicaragua is a prime candidate for newest lost ally.
If Chen does walk away from the capital without a sincere assurance from Ortega, he could do worse than fire off this parting shot: Look at what Beijing did to Guatemala and Haiti and consider the contempt China felt toward their disempowered, shell-shocked populations by threatening to boycott UN peacekeepers simply because Taiwan was their ally. By any moral standard -- for liberals or conservatives, leftists or rightists -- China's misanthropy was, and is, detestable.
Taiwan has been named and criticized as a corruptor of poor nations through checkbook diplomacy. Even if this is the case, the truth is that, unlike Taiwan, China's involvement in poor regions is not under the control of a democratically elected government and is therefore unaccountable to all but the most mercenary of bureaucrats.
Nor is it necessarily stabilizing. That China should be cited as a potential patron by the thugs impersonating soldiers in Fiji's latest disastrous coup in the face of boycotts by Australia and New Zealand says far more about China than any number of accusations against Taiwanese funny money can say about Taiwan.
The risk for Chen is that he could look utterly inept if Nicaragua were to swap allegiance soon after the inauguration. Given his difficulties at home, however, Chen could hardly be intimidated by such minor corrosion of his image. If anything, Chen's willingness to take the flight to an uncertain ally and fly the flag, so to speak, is the sign of a president who might just be beginning to fight back.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS