In most sports, it is said that the best defense is a good offense. The more forward momentum you have, the harder it is for your opponent to knock you down.
Given the rise of China's global power and the continuation of Beijing's cut-throat strategy of strangling Taiwan's international space, it is essential for Taiwan to turn defense into offense.
In the past year we have witnessed China's offensive diplomacy in Africa and Central America, as well as continued efforts to block Taiwan's bid for observer status in the WHO.
Beijing's "purchase" of Taiwan's former diplomatic ally Chad on the eve of Premier Su Tseng-chang's (
The past year's experience shows that while Taiwan has been answering its opponent's attacks, its efforts have been to little avail. If the nation is barely moving, or trying to stand still, even the slightest push will make it go backwards.
While being aggressive constitutes the core element of Taiwan's new diplomatic initiatives, intelligence and aggressiveness must go hand in hand. The time for new thinking and strategic planning is now, before the first punch is thrown.
New policy depends more on the reallocation and redistribution of existing resources than a major review of operations. The goal is to keep China busy with Taiwan's diplomatic maneuvering.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was in power, it was the "number of allies" that mattered. The goal of diplomacy was to maintain as many diplomatic allies as possible. The result was that both sides of Taiwan Strait engaged in so-called "money diplomacy."
Even after the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power, the situation remained largely unchanged, though the DPP government introduced some creative ideas such as placing more emphasis on humanitarian assistance and non-governmental organization activities.
Nevertheless, Taiwan continues to be labeled as a "bad influence" along with China by Australia and New Zealand on the island nations of South Pacific. The diplomatic battles between Taipei and Beijing in Central America and Africa attracted more attention than the government's efforts in non-political areas.
To distinguish Taiwan's diplomatic practices from China's, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should mobilize its embassies and representative offices to "light fires" wherever possible to keep Beijing busy trying to put them out.
For example, instead of engaging in the "money game" with China, Taiwan should show evidence to its allies that Beijing cannot deliver on its promises. Moreover, Taiwan should keep reminding countries that contemplate embracing Beijing the downside of China's growing influence, including its negative impact on local employment and economic growth.
A unified information program should be executed by the ministry and the Government Information Office worldwide to shatter the misconception that "China is a peaceful rising power" and reveal to the world community that Beijing's "peaceful development" is based on militaristic and authoritarian foundations.
To incorporate civil society into foreign affairs practices, Taiwan's political parties should set aside partisan differences.
They must facilitate communication and coordination between parties, the government and the people, so as to seek a consensus on diplomatic strategies and use this unified force to confront China's international suppression of the nation's sovereignty.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS