Following its electoral defeat in Kaohsiung and its loss of support in the Taipei mayoral race, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has held a number of meetings to pinpoint the reasons for its failure.
Reasons cited have ranged from blaming the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for indulging in foul play to blasting President Chen Shui-bian (
The feebleminded KMT continues to ignore, or stubbornly refuses to acknowledge, that its pro-China propaganda is increasingly remote from mainstream public opinion.
In view of last Saturday's showing, some KMT members have proposed that the party move its headquarters to Kaohsiung, while others have suggested Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The DPP headquarters is not down south nor do many of its second-generation Mainlander members speak fluent Taiwanese, but no one questions the DPP when it trumpets itself as a pro-localization party.
Shouldn't the KMT trumpet the pro-localization banner even louder, given that it has been in Taiwan for almost 60 years?
Many foreign workers or spouses learn to speak competent Mandarin within a couple of years of their arrival and many come to embrace Taiwan's culture and history with fondness and appreciation. The KMT should be ashamed that it remains a stranger in a strange land. Many of the KMT's old guard and their descendents still know no Taiwanese, have no appreciation for Taiwan's culture and don't identify with the land that has sheltered them for so long.
Time and again the KMT under Ma has sworn that its ultimate goal is unification with China. It's performance last Saturday should be a wake-up call for the party to reassess its policy and platform.
According to a recent survey by the Election Study Center at National Chengchi University, the percentage of respondents who consider themselves "Taiwanese" increased from 56 percent last year to 60 percent this year. A survey released yesterday by the Straits Exchange Foundation suggested that 57 percent of people identify themselves as Taiwanese.
It is time for the KMT to become pro-localization and identify with Taiwan. It is time for it to ditch its outdated "one China" policy and stop deluding itself that China is its motherland and that one day it will rule there again.
It should take a lesson from two-time British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli, who once said: "I must follow the people. Am I not their leader?"
Ma should take this piece of advice if he still harbors ambitions of winning the people's hearts and the 2008 presidential election. For a start, why not change the party's name to the Taiwan Nationalist Party?
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS