When it comes to elections, it is generally acknowledged that all politics are -- or should be -- local. Nevertheless, the key issues that characterize the upcoming mayoral and city councilor elections are often associated with national and political rhetoric and have nothing to do with who is capable of doing the job.
For example, Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman (KMT) Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has called upon the voters to use the elections as a no-confidence vote on the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) allegedly corruption-driven governance. The KMT's candidate for Taipei, Hao Lung-bin (郝龍斌), has characterized the mayoral election as a decisive test for the 2008 presidential election.
The KMT has adopted the strategy of defaming President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), members of the first family and Chen's Cabinet as a way to sabotage the image of the DPP candidates in Taipei and Kaohsiung.
As a result, DPP Taipei mayoral candidate Frank Hsieh (
It is also difficult to see why KMT Taipei mayoral candidate Hao's past working experience in the DPP Cabinet would affect his capability to serve as mayor, as some commentators might be tempted to argue.
From the voters' perspective, why should problems associated with the nation's leaders affect how or why they choose a mayor or a city councilor?
Campaigns cannot win if they are based solely on a negative message. Their organizers must come up with positive images and feasible visions. Negative campaigns have their place, but they should not be the focal point of a winning campaign.
Negative campaigns are sometimes used as tactical tools to gain an advantage. But most of the time, negativity will only work once a party has laid out an alternative vision for their candidate through positive advertisements and determination to reform.
For example, Hsieh was better known for his successful revamping of Kaohsiung's Love River -- once a dark and stinky stream -- into a clean area that is perfect for leisure. To what extent, then, can Hao surpass Hsieh in this regard?
Hao's greatest challenge, therefore, lies in showing how he could do a better job than Ma if he were to win the election. While the incumbent usually carries a substantial challenge of retaining his supporters, his successor must demonstrate a different leadership style and vision. Hao has nevertheless criticized Ma's failure to crack down on the sex industry, to manage the SARS crisis and to handle damage caused by typhoons.
For Hsieh to win more votes -- especially from Taipei's middle class -- he needs to make it clear to the residents how he would manage to go beyond his accomplishments in Kaohsiung. Relentlessly criticizing the Hao family's alleged inappropriate use of public funds is just not a good tactic.
In Kaohsiung, the KMT's mayoral candidate Hung Jun-ying (黃俊英) must stop playing the "sympathy card" by exploiting the car accident involving Shirley Shaw (邵曉鈴), the wife of Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), and honestly demonstrate to the voters why he can regain the support of the party's rank and file, which he lost four years ago.
His DPP rival, Chen Chu (
By overlooking the importance of reporting the messages of the candidates and instead focusing on the character assassination war, the media are failing in their obligation to provide the electorate with the means by which to judge the value of platforms of the candidates.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS