No sooner had the government dubbed the proposed buyout of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc (ASE) by Carlyle Group "a sign of faith in the nation's investment climate" and the press lauded the deal as "the largest ever involving a Taiwanese company," than its repercussions in business circles and at the national level were beginning to be felt.
In the 1993 movie Jurassic Park, the chaos scientist Ian Malcolm, played by Jeff Goldblum, argued that "life will find a way" to reproduce, even if the beings concerned -- dinosaurs in the film -- are all females.
The film reminded many in the industry just what happened last Friday when ASE, the world's largest semiconductor packaging and testing company, confirmed it had received an indication of interest from a private equity consortium led by the Carlyle Group, paving the way for the Taiwanese firm to openly invest in China.
The reason why the analogy is a pertinent one is that if ASE agrees to the all-cash buyout by the Carlyle-led consortium -- and provided the government does not oppose it -- ASE will be transformed into a foreign company. At that point, Carlyle will likely apply to delist ASE from the Taiwan Stock Exchange, as long as it secures 75 percent of the outstanding common shares of the local firm. This will in turn allow ASE to circumvent the government's China-bound investment restrictions, especially the present 40 percent investment ceiling of a listed company's net value.
As the buyout has yet to be concluded, the reason why ASE chairman and chief executive officer Jason Chang (
One thing that is certain is that both US-based Amkor Technology and Singapore's STATS ChipPAC -- ranked second and third in the sector, respectively -- have been stepping up their investments in China to undercut ASE's competitiveness while the firm is still waiting for the government to commit itself to action.
If the NT$179.27 billion (US$5.46 billion) buyout of ASE materializes, it will embarrass a government that has worked so hard to encourage local manufacturers to "keep their roots" in Taiwan. It would also pour cold water on a government which had hoped to attract 70 companies to list themselves on the local stock markets next year and 250 companies within the next three years.
It would also mean the loss of another blue-chip company from the local bourse, after Green Point Enterprises Co, a mobile phone casing maker, agreed last week to a buyout deal by US electronics component maker Jabil Circuit and will delist next year.
In the past, buyouts of local firms were usually an isolated phenomenon. Nowadays, the appetite of foreign investors is higher and businesses are more keen on delisting. Several investment banks, including Goldman Sachs, have predicted more foreign investors will follow suit in shopping for other potential acquisition targets in Taiwan, especially those which are undervalued, such as United Microelectronics Corp, MediaTek, Quanta Computer and Lite-On Technology Corp.
Coupled with recent cases of companies that have announced capital reduction plans, the government should be wary of companies that may attempt to delist their stock in order to circumvent China-bound investment regulations. Life will find a way and so do companies. The publicized cases are just the tip of the iceberg.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS