Far from clarifying the matter, the Taipei City Government's admission on Nov. 14 that one of its workers had forged receipts to claim reimbursement from Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
Ma, who is being investigated by the Black Gold Investigation Center of the Taiwan High Court Prosecutors' Office over allegations he has misappropriated money from the fund, has not given clear answers about his expenditures from the fund.
People are baffled by the contradiction between the Taipei administration's claim to running a "clean government" and its claim that the unspent remainder of the special allowance fund was Ma's personal property.
The public doesn't understand why Ma refuses to publish lists detailing which charity groups he donated money to.
And people want to see a detailed list of which city government personnel received bonuses on Ma's recommendation.
By all means, until Prosecutor Hou Kuan-jen (侯寬仁) is done with his investigation and the courts hand down a verdict, Ma should be considered innocent.
Nevertheless, by any measure, Ma falls well short of adhering to the "highest moral standard" that he constantly lectures others about. Perhaps this is a result of the dual roles Ma performs.
Mayor Ma must have been absent from the meeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma held on Jan. 7 in Miaoli with scores of KMT county and city officials looking on.
At the time, Chairman Ma righteously proclaimed that the KMT "must implement the principles of clean governance."
Chairman Ma said he hoped "all party and public servants would ... dare not to be greedy."
At the event, Chairman Ma instructed members of his own party that "when encountering scandals, one must take the initiative to discover the facts of the matter, deal with it in a forthright manner, be cooperative with investigators and explain the circumstances to the public."
Mayor Ma must have also missed the half-page advertisement that Chairman Ma ran in several Chinese-language newspapers on June 18.
In the ad entitled "The answer is within the hearts of all parents," Chairman Ma detailed the reasons why the KMT supported a recall motion again President Chen Shui-bian (
"How are we to teach our children in the future the meaning of `integrity?'" the ad asked.
"How do we give an answer when a child says: `You can lie so long as you don't get caught by the teacher?'" it asked.
"If we don't punish people who are corrupt, that would mean people tolerate corruption and [as a result] governing officials will become more greedy," the ad said.
Pity Mayor Ma, because if he were to heed Chairman Ma's words, he wouldn't have ended up in the hot water he now finds himself in -- hot water that could cost him his chance to run in the 2008 presidential election.
Then again, maybe it's not fair to hold Mayor Ma up to the "standards" set by Chairman Ma. After all, it may be that Chairman Ma is also a hypocrite who doesn't practice what he preaches.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS