As the old saying goes, "it's easier said than done."
Apologizing for an aide forging receipts to claim mayoral fund expenses, Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Both Ma and the Taipei City Government portrayed the event as a mere "administrative flaw."
The mayoral fund case shares a key similarity with the fracas over President Chen Shui-bian's (
The double standard is brazen. Ma called Chen's behavior "corruption" and demanded the president step down. When caught doing the same thing, he dismisses the case as administrative negligence.
Ma stressed that he had been "executing official duties according to the law" when the expenses were incurred and claimed. But just which law is Ma referring to that obliges government officials to forge receipts?
On several occasions Auditor-General Su Chen-ping (
But more appropriately, Su should be subjected to a formal inquiry to determine whether he attempted to cover up for Ma and whether he benefited illegally from the fund himself. There is sufficient prima facie evidence available to demand a probe -- at least as much evidence as was originally available when the pan-blues called for an investigation into Chen's use of the "state affairs fund."
On the legislative floor on Tuesday, a number of pan-blue legislators suggested that Premier Su Tseng-chang (
Now with Ma's integrity also in question, surely those same pan-blue legislators will follow their own advice and quit their jobs?
The timing of the Taipei City Government's press conference on Tuesday night also raised some eyebrows. The conference came just six hours after Ma was questioned by investigators from the Taipei High Court Anti-Corruption Center. Why did it take so long to own up?
While both the Taipei City Government and Ma yesterday laid blame on one of the mayor's aides for switching receipts, the question needs to be asked: How and why would a civil servant use a fake receipt without authorization from his superior?
Chen at least had the fortitude to openly admit that he authorized others to "switch receipts" to write off expenditure for his secret diplomacy.
The truth of the matter is that both the mayoral expense fund and the "state affairs fund" are indicative of an era when public money was usedwith impunity. The rules governing these funds are out of date in today's democratic environment.
But until the legal structures are fixed, let's hold Ma up to his own standards of morality: Mayor Ma, you were caught with your hand in the cookie jar. Maybe you should consider stepping down.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS