On Sunday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei mayoral candidate Frank Hsieh (
Soong has been instrumental in moves to depose the president, so by throwing down this challenge, Hsieh is saying that if more people in Taipei agree with Soong, then he will join the anti-Chen voices.
On the surface, Hsieh's linking of his election performance to his future conduct may seem foolish and make him look like a political fly-by-night.
But Hsieh's announcement is just the latest ingredient in a campaign that has consisted of a delicate mix of policies appealing to optimism even as he indulges in negative campaigning.
Earlier, DPP legislators close to Hsieh launched several broadsides at his main rival, the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) Hau Lung-bin (
They leveled allegations about how Hau and his father, former premier and KMT bigwig Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村), had abused privileges that were part of the old KMT system of patronage. They said former high-level officials such as Hau could live rent-free in government housing and have utility bills paid by the state.
These attacks have been offset by more positive attempts at policy formulation.
Along with the election-time promise to clean up Taipei's rivers -- in line with what he did with the Love River during his time as Kaohsiung mayor -- Hsieh has touted the idea of bringing the Olympic Games to Taipei in 2020 courtesy of his experience in helping Kaohsiung win the right to host the 2009 World Games.
Everybody knows Hsieh's Olympic dream is impossible in the face of China's relentless smothering; still, the idea is designed to make Taipei's residents sit up and think: "Why should Taipei be any different?"
However, turning the DPP's mayoral election fortunes into a plebiscite on the president's future shows just how wily an electoral opportunist Hsieh is.
It is a blatant attempt to split the pan-blue vote.
Hsieh is fully aware that Soong is not doing well in the opinion polls and that both he and Soong are trailing Hau by a considerable margin. He also knows that a split blue vote represents his only chance of winning Taipei, long a bastion of KMT support.
However, Hau cannot win without support from the city's deep-blue element, which has so far been behind Soong and his anti-Chen efforts.
In making his offer, Hsieh is trying to tempt those who dislike him and the DPP to side with Soong and thus eat into Hau's support. The strategy leaves him with nothing to lose, as enough pan-blue supporters will stick with Hau to make a Soong victory impossible, which means he will never have to make good on his promise.
If his plan comes off then he will have a chance of victory -- so long as traditional DPP voters do not desert the party in the wake of first lady Wu Shu-jen's (
Hsieh may not have factored that outcome into his calculations.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS