Taiwan's international sporting profile remains reliant on the efforts of outstanding individuals such as baseballer Wang Chien-ming (
If Taiwanese are to take themselves seriously, and expect others to treat them with respect, then there are certain standards of behavior in the nation's name that must be upheld by its officers. This is no less true for individuals working in high-profile positions in seemingly apolitical areas such as sports.
Wu Ching-kuo (
This is wishful thinking at best, whether or not both sides can claim political capital from the torch's route. Indeed, it is laughable that sports -- which China sees more as nationalistic weapons than forums for constructively interacting with other nations -- will defuse tensions given how poverty-stricken the sporting culture of both countries is.
Ideally, if Wu were acting in Taiwan's interests, he would insist that the torch only enter Taiwan if it is not used to bolster Chinese propaganda. But there's little hope of that. Wu is serving on the Beijing Olympic Games Coordination Commission, so we can expect that he will be well-behaved and not do or say anything that would embarrass his superiors.
However, when Wu was asked if Taiwanese and Chinese should march under the same flag -- like athletes from North and South Korea -- he came out with the astonishing response that, according to a Chinese source, "it was still too early to speculate, as the political climate in Taiwan might change."
If Wu did say this, then he is a fool and should be disowned and any association between him and Taiwanese sporting pursuits permanently severed as far as the government is able.
But we cannot be optimistic that the government will do this, given that the Chen administration and its tag team of underperforming premiers have paralyzed themselves with cowardice in acting on issues over which it has the authority to act swiftly and without legislative interference.
In the meantime, here are a few questions for Wu.
First: Whose flag should the athletes march under? The Chinese are hardly likely to march under the Olympic flag, and especially not at home. And there's not much else to choose from.
And second: Has Wu divorced himself so far from Taiwanese public sentiment that he would consider his language to be inoffensive to more than a few Taiwanese independence blowhards?
Taiwanese sport suffers because its administrators are underfunded, undermanned and, in many if not most cases, incompetent and embarrassingly ignorant of the sports they represent.
Taiwanese sport will suffer even more if the government does not have the guts to disassociate itself from this increasingly shifty member of the politically mercenary IOC.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS