At a recent birthday dinner for former presidential advisor Koo Kwang-ming (
Although the response was not warm, political leaders in and outside of Taiwan are all carefully awaiting Chen's next move because of his success in pushing for a referendum law as well as a constitutional amendment enshrining the institution of the referendum in the Constitution. He also overcame the restrictions inherent in his "four noes" to freeze the National Unification Council and national unification guidelines.
In addition, the North Korean nuclear test and the resulting tensions in East Asia create an international environment conducive to Taiwan's adopting a new constitution, because Pyongyang's threat means the US is likely to need Taiwan more than ever before.
At the same time, constititional topics accentuate the main difference between the pan-blue and pan-green's political stances. The pan-blues are clearly intent on ousting Chen and incriminating his family. The pan-greens have spotlighted institutional reform. In the past they pushed for direct election of the president and the right to elect the entire legislature, and now their focus includes the Constitution and referendums. All these topics revolve around institutional changes.
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (
The media and pan-blues largely brushed off the discussion on the Second Republic, and conspiritorial analyses abound. Very few discussions mention the necessity and urgency of the Second Republic concept to the nation. In the past, the pan-blue camp has had exactly the same hesitant reaction to referendums and constitutional reform.
Now the pan-blue camp's attitude could become even more conservative in consideration of KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (
All political parties should take surveys to see how voters feel about constitutional reform after suffering through so much partisan conflict.
More importantly, the concept of a "Second Republic" could both extend the Republic of China and offer a clean break from the Constitution. It offers an ingenious way of getting around the framework set by the "four noes" pledge and satisfy the need for a new constitution for Taiwan.
In particular, this would be in the same spirit as Chen's decision to "freeze" the unification guidelines instead of abolish them. Using an explanatory foreword to maintain the symbolic status of the guidelines didn't violate the "four noes" pledge, but it still indirectly broke through the limits imposed by Chen's promise.
It doesn't matter how much the Constitution is amended. Abolishing the previous amendments and returning to the original version could be considered a "second constitution."
In response to the proposal for this "second constitution" -- which is designed for the benefit of Taiwan, and which seeks to give the Constitution an appropriate use and form and make it pertinent to the present -- perhaps Ma and the pan-blue politicians should take a minute to think before mocking it.
The KMT is the biggest opposition party. If it makes people feel that it is only concerned with bringing down Chen and making Premier Su Tseng-chang (
Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant research fellow at the Sun Yat-sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Jason Cox and Marc Langer
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers