Here's a personal evaluation of the major players in the recent anti-Chen campaign:
Taiwan's Military: Just when you thought it couldn't get much more depraved in Taiwan, the military in Thailand stages a coup. Despite lobbying by the pan-blue media the military remained impartial, steadfast and strong. Two thumbs up.
Taipei Police: Ever had a jerk for a boss that didn't hesitate to abuse his workers for his own personal benefit? The general public sympathized with the Taipei Police and the hardships they were forced to endure for a month. Despite being faced with extraordinary circumstances and exhaustion they remained disciplined and professional. Two thumbs up.
President Chen Shui-bian (
Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九): Ma initially disapproved of the campaign, but quickly changed tack and launched into a bizarre series of about faces and contradictions, all the while playing every opportunity for personal political gain. In the end, he could no longer control the monster he helped create and whined like a spoilt brat that it wasn't his fault. Two thumbs down: Depose.
Taiwan's (Pan-Blue) Media: It should be very clear by now that the media has made a mockery of all journalistic standards -- providing a heavily biased and distorted representation of the campaign. The scary part is how effective they were in swaying public opinion. Also two thumbs down.
Shih Ming-teh (
People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜): The Great Helmsman of a tiny splinter party that exists only to gratify his ego is also a convicted tax evader after getting busted for laundering millions of dollars to the US using the bank accounts of his relatives. Yet he portrays himself as an anti-corruption warrior and insists that the president step down because his wife received US$8,000 worth of department store coupons. What a sad joke. Two thumbs down and a steel toed boot to the arse.
Mike Miller
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath