There are some in Taiwan who are in serious need of a history lesson. I refer to those anti-Chen Shui-bian protesters who carry posters comparing Chen to Adolf Hitler.
I'm not a big fan of Chen, but likening him to Hitler? Come off it. Regardless of your personal views of Chen, or whether you support former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
In Hitler we have a man who ordered the invasion of sovereign nations and the genocide of 6 million Jews. It doesn't matter what Chen is accused of -- he hasn't done anything that comes even remotely close to these crimes.
These allusions to Hitler display a lack of understanding for the survivors of World War II, of the concentration camps and for the relatives of those who perished. Even if the disregard of these people's feelings weren't enough to condemn the use of these posters, we must also consider how these things impact upon the perceptions that foreigners have of Taiwan.
With footage from the anti-Chen demonstrations being broadcast around the world, these protesters become ambassadors for the country's image. Do we want the outside world to view Taiwan as a nation too poorly educated to see the difference between alleged corruption and genocide?
I pray that your answer is no.
Andrew Crosthwaite
Minhsiung, Chiayi County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath