So the campaign initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Thankfully the day, with the exception of a couple of small incidents, was peaceful.
But apart from proving that a few weeks' notice, excessive media coverage and a national holiday is all anyone needs to mobilize more than 100,000 people, what else did yesterday's actions achieve?
The main purpose was to keep the anti-Chen Shui-bian (
The nationwide "tour" kept the campaign in the headlines until yesterday, presenting the red-clad protesters with the perfect opportunity to make a scene, as the president would be making a high-profile, public appearance.
That so many people would take part in the protest was never in doubt, because as well as being a national holiday, northern Taiwan remains a bastion of pan-blue support and it is that support -- both in numbers of people and cash -- that has kept the protest going much longer than it deserves.
However, Double Ten National Day -- which marks the Wuchang Uprising in 1911 and serves as a symbolic proxy for the creation of the Republic of China -- is a day that celebrates the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and all that it stands for. The decision by pan-blue lawmakers and their supporters, who make up the bulk of Shih's red army, to disrespect their precious day would have had China's leaders rubbing their hands in glee, assuming they have any understanding of what is going on.
By making a mockery of the National Day celebrations, the Shih campaign is playing directly into the hands of the Chinese Communist Party and its plans to eradicate Taiwan in the international arena -- many foreign VIPs and guests canceled their attendance at the celebrations in fear of what might happen. Yesterday's skylarking will further motivate the pan-blue camp to block reform and sow discord within the legislature while blaming the president, when in fact the legislature's problems have little to do with him and much more to do with contempt for the political system as a whole.
It was predictable that certain pan-blue lawmakers would disrupt the president's speech, because in this nation's political theater, anyone who plays up is guaranteed attention thanks to the vacuous media.
But their actions also did a disservice to the chronically ambiguous Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Maybe they believed, as pro-China media outlets have suggested, that the world would see how unhappy they are with their president. Indeed, the protest leaders said that one of the aims of yesterday's "siege" was to spread the message around the globe. But a glance at CNN would tell them that the world doesn't care one little bit about the current bout of Chen-hatred. There are much more important things going on.
And yesterday did not bring the protesters any closer to their goal of forcing the president to step down, because as much as they shout "depose" and make the thumbs-down gesture, there is still one inconvenient fact that remains: They have yet to show that Chen has done anything wrong.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS