Some economic booms grind to a halt, others run out of steam, but in China the biggest risk is that growth will dry up. Water, the country's scarcest resource, is running out. Pollution, waste and over-exploitation have combined with the expansion of mega-cities to foul up wells and suck rivers dry.
Signs of a crisis are apparent everywhere. In the arid north, four-fifths of the wetlands along the region's biggest river system have dried up. In the west, desert sands are encroaching on many cities. In the south, the worst drought in 50 years has ruined crops and prompted water shortages even along the banks of the Yangtze River, the nation's biggest waterway.
Domestic newspapers are increasingly filled with grim statistics and reports of the latest pollution spill. In June, the state environment protection agency estimated that 90 percent of urban water supplies were contaminated with organic or industrial waste. According to the water resources ministry, 400 of the country's 600 cities are short of water.
Water has always been China's Achilles heel. The world's most populous country has per capita water resources of 2,200m3 -- less than a quarter of the world average. The shortfall between supply and demand is estimated at 6 billion cubic meters. The gap is likely to widen as the population grows from 1.3 billion people to an estimated 1.6 billion by 2030.
Worsening the problem is the stark regional variation between the dry north and the wet south. Beijing -- one of 110 cities deemed to suffer from "extreme shortages" -- has been forced to import supplies from a widening circle of sources.
In short, China's development model is unsustainable. For the past 30 years the government has emphasized the quantity rather than the quality of growth. Spectacular expansion figures of almost 10 percent a year mask dire inefficiency and environmental damage. For most of the past 30 years, financial resources have been invested in new factories rather than treatment plants, water recycling facilities or replacements for leaky pipes.
Only 52 percent of the country's 2 billion cubic meters of sewage is treated before it goes into rivers and lakes. This has expensive health implications. Each year, filthy water is a big factor in the 800 million cases of diarrhea, 650,000 cases of dysentery and 500 million cases of intestinal worms.
Industrial pollution creates political as well as physical concerns. Suspicions are rife that factory owners collaborate with government officials to cover up toxic spills in the interests of social stability and economic growth. But China's water crisis is not only the responsibility of officials and developers. Scientists blame global warming for the shrinking of glaciers and the disappearance of thousands of lakes in the Himalayas and other mountain regions in the west of China.
Climate change is also thought to have contributed to the worst drought in 50 years in Chongqing and Sichuan. No rain has fallen for 10 weeks and two-thirds of the rivers have dried up. Worse may be yet to come.
The head of the China Meteorological Administration has told China Energy Weekly that global warming will lead to shortages of 20 billion cubic meters of water in western China by 2030. There are signs that the government is taking these warnings more seriously.
President Hu Jintao (
Yet the prevailing ethos is that the problems of growth and science can be solved by more growth and more science. Cloud seeding is being used to induce precipitation artificially. Despite the increasingly evident environmental impact of giant hydroelectric plants such as the Three Gorges Dam, the nation's thirst for energy has pushed policy makers to announce plans for dozens of dams along the tributaries of the Yangtze, the Yellow and the Nu rivers.
The biggest hydro-engineering plan of all has just started. The US$63 billion north-south water diversion plan involves the construction of three giant canals from the Yangtze up to the arid north and west. The work is expected to take 50 years. Once completed, it will channel 44 billion cubic meters of water across the Chinese landmass.
Environmentalists argue that China needs a fundamental change of philosophy. Although Hu's administration has promoted sustainable development for three years, local governments do not appear to be listening. Why should they? With no elections and no free media, cadres are more worried about their superiors than the people they are supposed to serve.
The government admits that the problems of water shortages and pollution are getting worse. Clean-up goals set last year already look unattainable. In the first six months of this year the government's key index of water pollution -- chemical oxygen demand -- rose 3.7 percent and discharges of sulphur dioxide increased 4.2 percent.
If there is a positive side, it is that the water crisis could help to open up a closed society and make it more environmentally conscious. In recent years, Beijing has shown a willingness to listen to green non-governmental organizations, which would have been unthinkable in the past.
Ma Jun (馬軍), author of China's Water Crisis, says the next step is to foster greater public accountability so that people can act as a brake on unsustainable development of their communities.
"China has the technology and the money to solve this problem. But environmental departments usually find it difficult to enforce the law because local governments protect business first. What is needed is the involvement of the public," Ma said.
Many foreigners, particularly Germans, are struck by the efficiency of Taiwan’s administration in routine matters. Driver’s licenses, household registrations and similar procedures are handled swiftly, often decided on the spot, and occasionally even accompanied by preferential treatment. However, this efficiency does not extend to all areas of government. Any foreigner with long-term residency in Taiwan — just like any Taiwanese — would have encountered the opposite: agencies, most notably the police, refusing to accept complaints and sending applicants away at the counter without consideration. This kind of behavior, although less common in other agencies, still occurs far too often. Two cases
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
RSS