A review of recent aviation news: Alleged airliner terrorism plotters arrested in London. Fighter jets escorting diverted planes land in Boston and Amsterdam. Crashes in Ukraine and Kentucky. The anniversary of Sept. 11.
Need a tranquilizer with that plane ticket yet?
Argentines don't. In Buenos Aires which has the highest concentration of shrinks to citizens in the world, nail-biting fliers can now fight their fears while fully conscious.
Called Poder Volar, or "Able to Fly" a Spanish and Argentine company that says it is the world's first permanent, in-airport fear-of-flight center, has opened in the Jorge Newbury airport -- itself an ill-lit, depressing space that doesn't exactly inspire warm feelings about traveling.
Creators say the center's location in the ground zero of flight panic shows frazzled fliers that help is available and urges future passengers to visit the den of their fears. Students can also visit for one last pep talk before heading off to the boarding gate.
"It's like a dentist's office next to a restaurant, since people's teeth start hurting when they eat," said Dr Claudio Pla, the Argentine psychiatrist who started the company in 2000. "If you just got off or are about to get on a plane scared, but you see someone else resolving the issue, it inspires them to look for a solution."
In an era of color alert levels, the center joins a burgeoning cottage industry of flight jitter palliatives, said Marc-Antoine Plourde, president of a Montreal fear-of-flight treatment company. He is one of the organizers of a conference planned next spring at the International Civil Aviation Organization, a UN agency based in Montreal, where organizers expect more than 200 participants to discuss fear of flying. They plan to create a flight fear guidebook to distribute to the travel agents and airports.
The largely unregulated fear-of-flight treatment industry includes everything from Chicken Soup for the Soul's Fearless Flight Kit to self-help books, hypnosis tapes to therapists specializing in the phobia, and myriad classes offered by private companies and airlines that realize business profits when customers aren't afraid of the product.
Studies estimate that 16 percent of Western adults refuse to fly. An additional 10 percent to 15 percent of adults fly with some degree of fear, be it of crashing, enclosed spaces, yielding control or embarrassing oneself onboard with erratic fear-fueled behavior. Also, people tend to project doubts around travel -- entering the unknown, separating from loved ones, loneliness -- onto the plane itself, Pla says.
Symptoms are easy to detect: tossing down a preflight drink or sedative, canceling tickets right before a flight, refusing to fly, or being a wreck when you have to fly.
"I think the number [of people who fear flying] is increasing simply because there's more people that travel," Plourde said. "And certainly the terrorism aspect of commercial aviation today is not helping at all."
Unlike periodic courses offered in airports from Phoenix to London, Poder Volar will have professionals available for consultations 12 hours a day on weekdays, part-time on Saturdays, and on-call during Sundays and holidays.
The center offers a three-hour individual class for US$170, or eight-hour group classes for US$220.
Although Pla offers emergency sessions to walk-in passengers who are between flights or about to board for about US$30 per half hour, he says there's little to be done in such a short period of time. Treatment is reduced to a crash course on flight safety, and handing out a booklet on relaxation techniques or a sedative prescription to be filled at the airport pharmacy on the student's way out the door.
Women outnumber men two to one, Pla says, since women traditionally have fewer hang-ups about admitting fears than men.
But in Buenos Aires, a European-flavored city with a neighborhood named Villa Freud for its high concentration of psychiatrists, and where people talk about their shrinks with as much frequency as New Yorkers, seeking such help carries little stigma.
"It's true that psychotherapy is more popular here than in the United States," Pla said. "But we also have people that reject the idea of therapy, so we try to `de-psychologize' the treatment," and focus on changing behaviors.
Fernando Autet, a student at a recent class, seemed an unlikely seat clinger. A soft-spoken horse veterinarian, Autet, 30, says he never feared flying as a kid, but a turbulent flight in the US last year changed that.
Fearing a flight back to the US in late August, he showed up for a recent class with Pla's team, including an educational psychologist, and retired Aerolineas Argentinas pilot Jorge Albanece, who introduced himself saying, "I've flown into this airport 10,000 times, and I'm still here."
The instructors taught relaxation techniques and airplane safety statistics: Wings move, but they won't break off. Turbulence cannot damage a plane. Lightning cannot enter the cabin. Every system on a plane has several back-ups.
Students take a questionnaire rating their anxiety when facing various flight situations, and their score places them in one of three zones -- from green for the merely anxious to red for true phobics. They receive appropriately color-coded pins to wear during the flight to alert flight attendants that they are anxious.
The center claims to improve the quality of flying for 95 percent of its customers. Fresh off his flight to Myrtle Beach, North Carolina, Autet became one of them. He wrote the team an e-mail, saying that despite turbulence during the international leg of the flight, he relaxed with breathing exercises.
"The connecting flight in the USA I really enjoyed, watching from the window like I did when I was a kid," he added.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi