The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) four decades of martial-law rule on Taiwan came to an end in 1987, but Taiwan did not immediately escape from the shadow of authoritarian rule with free elections.
Unlike the former communist regimes in Eastern Europe that were able to establish democracy via free elections at the first try, it was not until 1996 that Taiwan's first presidential election took place. The national image created by the KMT's great Chinese ideology handicapped Taiwan by creating uncertainty over its international status and national identity.
German-British sociologist Ralf Dahrendorf once commented on democratization in Eastern Europe saying that the reason why Eastern Europe was able to successfully end domination by Communist regimes was because words like "citizen" and "civic" were not deleted from their vocabulary. Having survived the communist terminology purges, "citizenship" and "civic society" became beacons of freedom. Without exception, the post-World War II communist regimes all collapsed following free elections.
But in Taiwan, even though it commenced elections of public representatives, this did not signal the end of the KMT and its Chinese style of martial law rule. The elections of public representatives were not held based on the principles of free elections, but instead, they were no more than tools to be manipulated by politicians in the struggle to realize their own ambitions. In other words, the so-called "free elections" in Taiwan back then had nothing to do with the formation of a real civic society. Politics in Taiwan was commercialized rather than a part of cultural development, and it was not until 2000 that Taiwan realized its first transfer of political power.
Unfortunately, Taiwan still has not fully experienced the benefits of its democratic transition. Rather, it has simply inherited China's old political system through the structures of the KMT government. The pressure to which President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) government has been subjected to because of its poor performance comes from outside the political system.
At first glance, the "One Million Voices Against Corruption" campaign may look splendid given its slogans of "civic society" and "anti-corruption." But in fact, the campaign is a product of the influence of Taiwan's blue colonial powers, the slanted reporting of the nation's pro-China media outlets and a fraudulent "revolution" by DPP insiders.
Because Chen's DPP administration has failed to push through a revolution in government, it has sparked a counter revolution, which has taken the form of political theater. Such a show, in which red replaces blue, could potentially pave the way for the creation of a "third power," but whether it can replace the KMT's colonial governmental structure is another question.
Dahrendorf said that the only real road is the road to freedom, and that its three pillars are democracy, a market economy and a vibrant civil society. Given that Taiwan's democratization is still underway, if people have anything to say about Chen's DPP administration, then they should do so by following the rule of law. If the campaign strategists do not harbor malicious intentions, they will not launch a coup and abandon the proper path of reforming and reconstructing the nation.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS