With Taiwan still very much enmeshed in the political conflict between supporters of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and followers of former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh's (施明德) anti-Chen campaign, Taiwanese haven't had much time to concern themselves with affairs in the rest of the world.
China has used this opportunity to quietly launch a fresh round of campaigns to gradually absorb Taiwan. In addition to its long-term policy, China has also adopted a number of new approaches.
First, Beijing is attempting to weaken the nation's economy by excluding it from participating in the establishment of a free-trade zone in East Asia. Japan has proposed an East Asian Free Trade Zone that would include the 10 member states of ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand.
However, because of China's objections, Taiwan is being excluded. If the formation of the trading bloc continues to progress, Taiwan's economy and industrial development is bound to suffer marginalization.
Second, Beijing has stepped up its tactic of bombarding Taiwan with agricultural incentives to befriend farmers here. On Aug. 1 last year, Beijing removed all tariffs for 15 kinds of fruit from Taiwan to ingratiate itself with farmers as part of its "united front" strategy.
Although both Taiwan and China are WTO member states, China has agreed to zero-tariff pacts with certain groups here outside the framework of the WTO. The initial proposal, made to former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
In April, the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a cross-strait economic forum in China. Following the forum, China inaugurated experimental cross-strait agricultural cooperation zones in both Guangdong and Guangxi provinces. It also tried to lure Taiwanese farmers' investments and acquire Taiwan's agricultural technologies, talent and capital by designating the establishment of industrial zones in both Fujian and Shandong for Taiwanese farmers to start businesses in China.
The CCP and KMT also plan to hold a forum on cross-strait agricultural cooperation next month in China's Hainan Province. China has implied through the media that it would provide more "incentives" to Taiwanese farmers at the meeting, but in the end, the incentives are designed to acquire investment and technology for China's benefit, not Taiwan's.
Third, China has strengthened its efforts to deny the fact that Taiwan is a nation and has worked to block the word "Taiwan" from appearing in any international organizations that symbolize national sovereignty.
While the nation recently discussed the feasibility of joining the UN using "Taiwan," China made efforts to oppose this and boycotted the US "note" that was appended to the UN Conventional Arms Registry (UNCAR), which showed US arms sales to Taiwan.
As a result, the UN decided that only the transfer of conventional weapons involving member states of the UN has to be reported to the UNCAR, forcing the US to stop registering its transfer of arms to Taiwan.
Clearly, China is adopting a systematic approach toward annexing Taiwan. If the people here have yet to become aware of Beijing's plot and continue to be entangled in the meaningless debates about the future of the president, then Taiwan will soon be forced off the world stage altogether.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS