In most places in the world, corruption is corruption, but in Taiwan it is different.
There is OK corruption and not OK corruption. It all depends on the color of the party you support, at least according to former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
In Taiwan, pan-blue corruption is OK, but suspected pan-green corruption means President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) should step down. Logical? Not quite, but logic may be a bit too much to expect from the pan-blue politicians, party members and the "red ants" following Shih.
Let's look at some examples. Start with none other than Mr Clean himself, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma has finally admitted that the KMT illegitimately acquired state assets when it took custodianship of Taiwan from the Japanese after World War II.
Ma has not apologized for this, but while admitting it might give a negative impression he explained, "It happened during a special period so there's no point in being too critical about it."
A "special period," ah yes, that means the period when the KMT controlled a one-party state and took what it wanted. If anyone resisted, protested, or objected they were either killed or imprisoned on Green Island. No, there is no point in being too critical about that.
The profits from using these state assets went into KMT hands and turned many party members into tycoons. Some of the assets have been sold, however. Was that money returned to the people? No, you see it had to be used to pay KMT pensions and other personnel fees, so that is OK.
As for KMT candidates, Ma has repeatedly supported those convicted of crimes of vote-buying and other, shall we say, "misdemeanors." Ma wants to run for president to succeed President Chen, but all the above is pan-blue corruption so it is OK.
Then there is James Soong (宋楚瑜), who may or may not be running for Taipei mayor. He rode behind Shih in the protest parade on Friday night and speaks often on why he should be elected and why Chen should step down. As one of the tycoons who benefited from the stolen assets and past KMT selective largesse, Soong has already been convicted of tax evasion. He has a minimum of five houses in the US and numerous stuffed bank accounts -- but that is OK, because that is pan-blue corruption.
Shih Ming-teh is not running for office now, and though he has not had a job for ages, Shih has been on the pan-blue welfare line for some time. He most recently flew to Thailand to meet Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪), a Taiwanese fugitive who ran off with Tuntex company funds, left huge debt behind and now hides out in and supports Communist China. All this makes Shih qualified to lead the anti-Chen campaign because this is pan-blue corruption and it is OK.
Then there is Hau Lung-bin (
This brings us back to Chen. Chen is not accused of any crimes himself, but as was said, his son-in-law has been indicted for insider trading. Chen's wife has also been questioned about alleged wrongdoing involving Sogo and Hyatt Regency coupons and vouchers. This is potential pan-green corruption so the president must step down.
Logical? I believe we left logic behind a long time ago.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taiwan.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS