After many years of celebrating the founding of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, this year's national day -- or Double Ten National Day -- looks like it will be marred by political protests and, perhaps ironically, by a core of pan-blue politicians who have long claimed steadfast loyalty to the ROC.
Shih Ming-teh (施明德), leader of the campaign seeking to oust President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced on Monday that he will lead thousands of protesters in another siege on the Presidential Office building on Double Ten day, blocking the front and rear entrances of the building to turn up the heat on Chen. He claimed that this was necessary to let the whole world know that the president must step down.
The anti-Chen protest is a PR move aimed at putting Chen on the spot as he plays host to a cohort of foreign diplomats and visitors, but the truth of the matter is that by doing this, Shih and his followers are simply bringing shame to everyone.
Taiwan already has its fair share of foreign policy difficulties. Under these circumstances, is it appropriate or acceptable to use this occasion to make a laughing stock of the nation in the international community? Is the Shih campaign's hatred toward Chen so deep that it is willing to embarrass him at the expense of the collective dignity?
This does not even mention the hint of violence that pervades the campaign -- organizers are calling it a "universal siege."
Chien Hsi-chieh, deputy head of the Shih camp, stressed that the event would be carried out in a peaceful manner. This is disingenuous: The campaign needs violence to retain the media's attention.
Will the Shih camp shoulder responsibility for such stupidity, or merely dismiss it as the "acts of a few over-enthusiastic individuals" as it did when reports of violent clashes between pro and anti-Chen protesters took place on Monday night in Kaohsiung and Tuesday night in Tainan?
The "universal siege" has gained the support of People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Double Ten day celebrates the start of the Wuchang Uprising on Oct. 10, 1911, which, under the leadership of Sun Yat-sen (
Given the Shih camp's determination to hold the "siege" on the ROC's national day, the DPP government might as well just call off the celebration altogether.
After all, what does the Wuchang Uprising have to do with Taiwan? Why celebrate an event in China that has only vague relevance for the lives of the vast majority of Taiwanese?
The ROC came into being at a time when Taiwan didn't even fall under its jurisdiction. In 1912, the nation was subject to another imperial power -- Japan. Celebrating Double Ten day here is akin to Taiwanese celebrating Thanksgiving -- it may once have been an important day in the world calender, but it's hardly ours.
Given that Shih and his followers couldn't care less about this year's national day, the public might as well take the chance to ponder when exactly Taiwan should hold its national celebration.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS