When the campaign to unseat President Chen Shui-bian (
However, a look at the agenda of the legislature reveals that the president's nominations for the Control Yuan and state public prosecutor-general have once again been blocked in the blue-camp-dominated Procedure Committee (the Control Yuan investigates corruption and other illegal behavior by public servants, among other duties).
The prosecutorial system investigates and prosecutes violations of the law, and the prosecutor-general is at the top of the tree. The pan-blue camp is asking that the president be investigated for corruption, but leaves the system without a leader.
So much for pan-blue lectures on graft.
If the pan-blue camp believes that some of the president's nominees are inappropriate, it can vote against those nominees during the review process and have them struck from the list.
Instead, while it is likely that the pan-blue camp is not opposed to certain nominees, it simply opposes the fact that Chen nominated them.
Chen's nomination for prosecutor-general, Hsieh Wen-ting (
The pan-blue camp would therefore rather stop the government from functioning than give Chen the smallest taste of success. And this is the way it has been for more than six years.
It is hard to judge the merit of the accusations that the KMT and pro-China media have leveled at Chen. These corruption allegations require a professional investigation by the Control Yuan and the prosecutorial system -- not hack reporters operating under instructions. Regardless, the KMT has allowed rumors and lies to be spread by refusing to put Chen's Control Yuan nominees to formal scrutiny, thus prohibiting the Control Yuan and the prosecutorial system from functioning.
Opposing graft is a just cause which should be supported by all, but this campaign should not be directed at getting rid of just one person. Irrespective of Chen's fate, there are legitimate concerns to be had over future KMT administrations, given the party's infamous record on corruption. Only a non-partisan legal system has the power to remove graft by the roots.
For a properly functioning legal system, the legislature should give priority to debating Chen's nominees for the Control Yuan and prosecutor-general, establish an anti-corruption agency and make other anti-corruption institutions function more effectively.
Secondly, it should pass the "sunshine bills" that set clearer standards on the use of assets, political donations, capital and lobbying by political parties, public servants and private organizations.
This would create greater political transparency and give voters more power in monitoring the interaction between government and civic society. This is the only path to building and maintaining government integrity.
An anti-corruption movement that only demands Chen's resignation and fails to address the need for a system that can fight corruption is nothing but a front for political wrangling and manipulation.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS