Many years ago I had the opportunity to see former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) at several small gatherings, and to listen to his impromptu speeches. The thing that made the deepest impression on me was his composure when talking about his past hardships. The way he spoke without a trace of agitation or hatred made me feel that he was a truly incredible person. During his speeches, my admiration for him only increased when he said that the only way he would enter China was with a regular visa, and never with a "Taiwan compatriot travel document" (台胞證). It seemed to me that he had suffered more than even Zhu Shunshui (朱舜水), the Chinese patriot who preferred to flee to Japan at the end of the Ming Dynasty and die in exile rather than bow his head to the Qing rulers.
I've recently heard Shih announce to the media that he wouldn't visit China if it refused to give up the use of violence against Taiwan. Although his stance seemed softer than it had been before, he retained a fortitude that his pan-blue and pan-green supporters and critics were incapable of. His words should have made many officials hang their heads in shame.
Many of the heavyweights who held important party, government and military posts during Taiwan's authoritarian era and constantly admonished the public to resist China now happily cross the strait to buddy up with the same people they used to condemn as communist bandits. For these people, it doesn't matter how many missiles China aims at Taiwan, nor how many of them are retired generals from the Whampoa Military Academy founded by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). They all still go in droves to China and look mockingly back at Taiwan, having completely forgotten what it was that Chiang taught them.
In comparison, Shih doesn't come from their same outstanding background, nor does he have particularly distinguished academic credentials to be haughty about. But when it comes to facing down a powerful neighbor, the steadfast moral fortitude that Shih displays far outshines many of those same political bigshots who used to condemn China. He indeed seems to be a copy of the beggar from a poem about the collapse of the Ming dynasty, where the beggar says that "the moral standards are only preserved in the lower classes" (
However, as much as I respect Shih for his determination in facing China, I'm afraid I am also disappointed by his campaign against President Chen Shui-bian (
In his early years, Shih stirred up dissent in his fight for Taiwanese independence. Although he seems to have abandoned this approach in recent years, localization, freedom and democracy should still be at the core of his ideology. Shih needs to take a step back and consider: Do the people who support his anti-Chen campaign share the same convictions and values as Shih does, or has he become their puppet?
Let's put aside supporters with a gangster background for now. Other supporters of Shih's anti-Chen sit-in protest include people from all walks of life: retired professors, popular and unpopular entertainers, esteemed artists and senior citizens. However, do these people really have even the most basic belief in freedom and democracy? Did they struggle for democracy and human rights in the past? What do they think about this land and its people deep down in their hearts? Is it a source of pride or of sorrow to have such supporters?
Today, Shih faces a dilemma. There can already be no turning back. If he turns his back on the protest, he will become isolated. But if he presses on, he will be responsible for more unrest. Still, with his past reputation and present momentum, it would not be difficult for Shih to choose another path and become a shared hero for both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Perhaps Shih could redefine the protest as a campaign against Chinese oppression and the annexation of Taiwan and speak out in support of the Chinese people's fight for freedom and human rights. The scale of such a campaign would be far beyond that of the campaign against Chen. In this way, Shih could become not only an irreplaceable spiritual leader in Taiwan, but also a guardian and spokesman for the Chinese people. This great opportunity may disappear if he does not take it soon. I wonder if he has the vision and resolution to accept -- and be truly deserving of -- the halo of morality?
David Ming is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Marc Langer and Eddy Chang
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s