The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) has announced it is applying for membership in the UN under the name "Republic of China (Taiwan)" this year. However, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has also discussed using the name "Taiwan" on its own. In so doing, the nation could apply for UN membership as a new member state and ask the General Assembly to re-examine UN Resolution 2758.
When applying as a new member state, the government can use either the name "Taiwan" or "the Republic of China." Until "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek (
Therefore, Taiwan will run into problems if it attempts to enter the UN under the name "the Republic of China."
To gain entry into the UN, Taiwan's only option is to use the name "Taiwan."
A new member state must be recommended by the Security Council and then acquire approval from two-thirds of the General Assembly to gain admission to the UN.
In addition, recommendation by the UN Security Council must be supported by nine of all 15 members, including the approval of the five permanent members.
So, if a permanent member of the Security Council vetoes the application, the Security Council recommendation will be blocked. An application for UN membership as a new member state is therefore bound to be vetoed by China, which means that an application under the name "Taiwan" is unfeasible in that arena.
Another tactic involves Resolution 2758. The 1971 resolution awarded the "China seat" to the People's Republic of China.
We could emulate the US Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which draws a distinction between the Taiwanese government and the Taiwanese people. In 1979, Washington terminated diplomatic ties with Taiwan but enacted the TRA to maintain a relationship between the people of the US and the people of Taiwan. Following this line of thinking, the UN expelled the Taiwanese government -- "Chiang's representatives" -- but not the Taiwanese people.
Thus, in 1971, the People's Republic of China gained entry to the UN. This addressed the Chinese people's right to be represented in the UN, but it created a new problem of how Taiwanese would be represented. Since the government is now requesting that the General Assembly resolve the issue, it should of course apply under the name "Taiwan."
Permitting or blocking national representation through the General Assembly is not without precedent.
And the benefit of using Resolution 2758 is that the UN General Assembly can decide on the issue of Taiwan's UN membership without requiring a recommendation from the Security Council, where China can exercise its veto.
The government must, however, use the name "Taiwan" rather than "Republic of China, Taiwan" that it is using now.
Chai Trong-rong is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS