Young Taiwanese athletes won multiple gold medals in an impressive display at this year's International Childrens Games in Bangkok. However, at the award ceremony, the Taiwanese participants had their national flag ripped from their shoulders by Chinese officials.
Leader of the Taiwanese delegation and Taipei Deputy Mayor King Pu-tsung (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
"This is the sixth time that Taipei has participated in this competition, while it is Beijing's first year. I am completely surprised by this rough attitude," he said.
Ma put the full responsibility on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but he limited his criticism to an objective description of China's "roughness" and stopped short of offering condemnation. Maintaining his image as "Mr Teflon," his intention is to clearly show that he doesn't take responsibility or admit fault in China's behavior.
Ma's feelings toward the CCP make us feel that his behavior is strange as well. The CCP has always been a malevolent party, which is why former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called them bandits. How could Ma, who was vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council at the time of Lee's comment, not understand the CCP's true nature? The CCP has consistently sponsored violence, so is it any surprise that it snatched a few flags?
In saying that Taiwan had been participating in the games longer than China, Ma seems to think that seniority matters.
But don't forget that Lee said in 1995 that "the Republic of China has existed for 84 years. The People's Republic of China has barely existed 40 years. We are the father, they are the son."
Does the CCP acknowledge this order? Not only does it refuse to acknowledge it, but a few months afterwards it held military exercises to act out "the son beating the father." If the CCP dares to beat its elders, why would it care which country had participated in an athletic competition more often?
Ma was "completely sur-prised" by China's brutishness, but the word "completely" exposes the limits of Ma's political wisdom. Ma is completely unaware of the CCP's dictatorial nature, so it's no wonder that Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is his idol.
Could it be that Ma thinks that his support for eventual unification would make China treat Taiwan better? To the CCP, Taiwan will forever be one of its regional administrations, the KMT will always be the CCP's child, and Ma will never be anything more than one of China's chief executives.
In the past, Ma has ordered the confiscation of Taiwanese flags at international sports competitions in Taipei because they violate Olympic convention. However, the fact that even spectators have had their Taiwanese flags confiscated demonstrates Ma's increasing willingness to pander to the CCP.
With Ma's lack of understanding of Taiwan's state affairs, it is not strange that people worry that he will be equally surprised by the possible consequences of former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
If Ma is elected president in 2008 and the CCP chooses to invade Taiwan militarily or through other deceptive means, that would probably come as a complete surprise to him as well, condemning Taiwan to eternal perdition.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Marc Langer
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under