Young Taiwanese athletes won multiple gold medals in an impressive display at this year's International Childrens Games in Bangkok. However, at the award ceremony, the Taiwanese participants had their national flag ripped from their shoulders by Chinese officials.
Leader of the Taiwanese delegation and Taipei Deputy Mayor King Pu-tsung (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
"This is the sixth time that Taipei has participated in this competition, while it is Beijing's first year. I am completely surprised by this rough attitude," he said.
Ma put the full responsibility on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but he limited his criticism to an objective description of China's "roughness" and stopped short of offering condemnation. Maintaining his image as "Mr Teflon," his intention is to clearly show that he doesn't take responsibility or admit fault in China's behavior.
Ma's feelings toward the CCP make us feel that his behavior is strange as well. The CCP has always been a malevolent party, which is why former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called them bandits. How could Ma, who was vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council at the time of Lee's comment, not understand the CCP's true nature? The CCP has consistently sponsored violence, so is it any surprise that it snatched a few flags?
In saying that Taiwan had been participating in the games longer than China, Ma seems to think that seniority matters.
But don't forget that Lee said in 1995 that "the Republic of China has existed for 84 years. The People's Republic of China has barely existed 40 years. We are the father, they are the son."
Does the CCP acknowledge this order? Not only does it refuse to acknowledge it, but a few months afterwards it held military exercises to act out "the son beating the father." If the CCP dares to beat its elders, why would it care which country had participated in an athletic competition more often?
Ma was "completely sur-prised" by China's brutishness, but the word "completely" exposes the limits of Ma's political wisdom. Ma is completely unaware of the CCP's dictatorial nature, so it's no wonder that Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is his idol.
Could it be that Ma thinks that his support for eventual unification would make China treat Taiwan better? To the CCP, Taiwan will forever be one of its regional administrations, the KMT will always be the CCP's child, and Ma will never be anything more than one of China's chief executives.
In the past, Ma has ordered the confiscation of Taiwanese flags at international sports competitions in Taipei because they violate Olympic convention. However, the fact that even spectators have had their Taiwanese flags confiscated demonstrates Ma's increasing willingness to pander to the CCP.
With Ma's lack of understanding of Taiwan's state affairs, it is not strange that people worry that he will be equally surprised by the possible consequences of former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
If Ma is elected president in 2008 and the CCP chooses to invade Taiwan militarily or through other deceptive means, that would probably come as a complete surprise to him as well, condemning Taiwan to eternal perdition.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Marc Langer
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength