In the 20th century, while the process of democratization progressed around the world, the People's Republic of China moved in completely the opposite direction. China claims that Taiwan (including the Pescadores) are part of its territory and threatens to use force if Taiwan declares independence. The most ironic thing is that the UN supports China's assertions!
Since World War II, self-determination has received popular support around the world, and with the UN acting as a mediator, more than 100 new nations have been established. The former USSR and communist-ruled Eastern Bloc nations recognized the trend toward democracy and broke up into many independent nations. The one-party dictatorship system was also abandoned.
The colony nations in Africa and Asia, one after another, severed links with their colonial rulers and became sovereign nations.
These developments have two common points. First, many of the newly established nations had long been ruled by people of a different race. Second, the communist system fell apart. We applaud this result, because we have finally realized the intrinsic value of each individual.
What does this have to do with China's claims upon Taiwan? Let's look at history. China's Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan after it lost the war with Japan in 1895.
Then, in 1911, Sun Yat-sen's (
Besides the changed name, the PRC also gained a new Constitution, a new national flag and new national anthem.
In light of this history, it is clear that Taiwan is not related to either the ROC or the PRC.
Should Taiwan be denied in its bid for self-determination -- which is really a formality, because Taiwan in almost all aspects is an independent country -- the nation could only be returned to the Qing Dynasty or its legal successor, but could not "revert" back to being part of the PRC, as the PRC did not exist when this nation was founded.
Furthermore, when so many former colonies have thrown off their colonial rulers, why should Taiwan instead accept a merger with the PRC when this nation has never been ruled by that government? Where is the international sense of justice and morality in this case?
Frankly speaking, any attempt to force a merger between Taiwan and China will be in vain, as the Taiwanese will never accept one-party dictatorship under the communist system that lags far behind the values and norms held by most nations around the world.
Taiwanese sources have indicated that they will submit a membership application in the name of Taiwan to the UN this month.
I sincerely request that all UN Security Council members earnestly observe the spirit of the UN Charter and do the moral thing by immediately stopping China's hegemony and granting membership to Taiwan.
Joseph Wang
Morris Plains, New Jersey
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS