On Sunday, President Chen Shui-bian (
The state visits coincide with the upcoming sit-in initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Shih's camp has urged Chen to cancel his trip and stay home to accept the protesters' demands. The pan-blue camp has slandered the president's trip, describing it as "running away."
The government has been planning the summit and state visits for more than six months. It is a pity to see all this over-politicization of domestic issues impacting on the nation's foreign affairs.
The Chen-haters' reaction to his diplomatic agenda, as well as the pan-blue camp's sabotaging of Taiwan's diplomatic efforts, are nonsense. They ignore the increasing imbalance between Taiwan and China in terms of diplomatic strength.
The timing of Chen's tour of the South Pacific is significant in a strategic way, given that Beijing bought off former ally Chad early last month. The fact that China has reached out to the world and exerted increasing influence in global affairs in recent years through frequent state visits to its allies constitutes a tremendous challenge to Taiwan's already-fragile foreign relations.
As China targets Taiwan's South Pacific allies, it is imperative that Chen increase diplomatic efforts to consolidate the nation's relationship with its diplomatic allies.
Chen's trip has two important functions. One is to correct any perception that opposition kowtowing to Beijing is representative of public opinion in this country. It is necessary for the government to launch an extensive international campaign to counter Beijing's divide-and-conquer strategy.
More importantly, Taiwan must develop a new foreign policy agenda in reaction to China's incorporation of "great nation diplomacy."
Since last year, Chinese leaders have toured South Asia, the South Pacific, the Middle East, Europe, the US and Africa. Constructive and strategic partnerships have been strengthened between China and many countries.
What can Taiwan do to counteract Beijing's growing international presence, particularly as China accelerates its activities rooting out Taiwan's allies in Africa and the South Pacific?
An increase in high-level official visits is a fundamental step in curing the regions of spreading China fever and strengthening Taiwan's diplomatic relations.
It is shameful to witness the pan-blue opposition and the Shih camp using Chen's overseas tour for domestic political ends.
Taiwan is a free and pluralist society. Demonstrations are protected by the law.
However, having the right to speak does and putting the nation at risk are different things.
In addition to maintaining a level of support from its allies, Taiwan should move beyond the narrow focus of political interests or the China factor to focus on creating long-term, stable relationships with members of the international community.
This must take place if the international community is to acknowledge the importance of Taiwan's democratic achievements and if Taiwan is to participate in the international order.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS