I do not want a country that has accustomed itself to colonial rule and that can never escape from the shadow of this slavish mentality.
Although Taiwan's transition of political power in 2000 was realized amid shouts of dissent, its democratization process is stuck in the management of a fictional state left by authoritarian leaders of the past, unable to impart and handle transitional justice.
The country is filled with statues of colonial dictators, and these symbols of colonial government can be found at major intersections, on school campuses and in government agencies and military camps in cities and the countryside.
I do not want a country in which politicians battle only for power and benefits in the way one handles a commercial career.
These politicians, who uncritically and without shame accepted colonial rule, now take pride in rationalizing that era.
Those who are former dissidents from the opposition movement have moved from reform to becoming part of the old establishment; some have inherited the behavior of the colonial ruler though they were never subdued by them while others were, and now they are praised for lauding the colonial administration.
I do not want a country whose people have empty, soulless bodies.
I see people locking themselves up behind iron-clad windows, unable to participate in society, focusing instead on making money and worshipping materialism.
In other words, these people are incapable of participating in cultural refinement, in spite of the nation's favorable economic circumstances.
These individuals include the middle class, the wealthy and the educated, who generally lack understanding of their national identity and behave as opportunistic immigrants might, defending the colonial system and resolutely rejecting political reform and the nation's reconstruction.
I do not want a country that does not believe in democracy and progress and that lacks faith in freedom and human rights.
I see that the mutual alienation under colonial rule has led to utilitarianism.
I also see that people attach themselves to a foreign power, disregarding the fact that this power is threatening their country.
These people are constantly deceiving and humiliating themselves.
I see people accepting different colonial models and unable to let the world understand that they really want independence.
I see cultural workers and artists shamelessly shouting slogans to promote a cheap revolution without the slightest feeling of shame.
I want a country that is free, democratic and beautiful.
I want a country in which people advance their civilization, respect human rights and treasure the natural environment.
I want a country whose people can walk out of the dark of their nation's past sufferings and boost justice and build a peace-loving society.
I want a country where people recognize their national identity, work together to protect their homeland and reach out to other nations with dignity and through gestures of goodwill.
I want a country that has the ability to maintain economic prosperity.
And I want a country that is capable of refining culture and voicing a rich national character that can generate a new vision for the nation.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS