Taiwan's opposition parties and interest groups are continuing to call on President Chen Shui-bian (
The pan-blue camp, for example, has spread rumors that the president's son-in-law, Chao Chien-ming (
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Shih-cheng (
DPP Legislator Wang Hsing-nan (
The headquarters for Shih's campaign to oust the president, on the other hand, has released information about death threats against Shih and asked for police protection. There have also been clashes between Chen's supporters and opponents in his home town in Tainan County.
The attacks have now extended to the personal morals of Chen, Shih and people close to them, as well as unification and independence supporters alike. This is creating an atmosphere of insecurity that will do no one any good.
Shih's cause to unseat the president through instigating a popular uprising is wrong-headed. Taiwan is a democracy that has clear legal requirements and procedures regulating the removal of a president.
The pan-blue camp's legislative recall motion failed and Chen retains the legal right to govern. Organizing street protests is not a good tactic, because if the president is forced to step down as a result, it will set a bad precedent for this nation's democracy.
The office of the president would become so easily swayed by political conflict that future presidents would eventually come under the same pressure. That would set Taiwan off on the same vicious political cycle seen in the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand and Indonesia.
Nonetheless, Shih and others opposed to Chen have a legal right to air their opinions as well as a limited degree of freedom to assemble. As long as they do not violate the law, these rights must be respected and protected.
The president's supporters may disapprove of Shih's proposition, but they should not physically attack him or threaten him. By the same token, the anti-Chen forces may protest, but the protests must not turn into riots resembling the debacle that followed the 2004 presidential election. Nor must those opposing Chen cook up unfounded charges or threaten him or his family's security.
Both sides grappling with this issue have strong arguments and public support, and neither side can easily defeat the other. The goal of adhering to democratic values and the rule of law should be placed above and beyond the issue of protecting or unseating the president.
If the nation can resolve this conflict in a civilized and rational manner, it will remain a democracy worthy of emulation. The alternative is a throwback to the days when political violence was par for the course.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS