The severing of diplomatic ties with Chad is neither an isolated nor a purely diplomatic issue. Even after the nation made such a large investment in diplomatic resources, Chad still decided to focus on short-term interests and threw in its lot with China, following the law of the international jungle. Given China's growing power and political influence, there is a risk that this decision will be the beginning of a negative trend.
Taiwan's response to this severe challenge should therefore not be the responsibility of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs alone. A consensual change in understanding and a new approach is required among government officials, diplomats and society at large to avoid being trapped in the cut-throat game of cross-strait diplomacy.
First, a distinction must be made between the diplomacy of recognition and practical diplomacy. The first involves working toward recognition by the international community and international organizations, while practical diplomacy revolves around protecting national interests and promoting social exchange.
At present, Taiwan may be the only state in the world to have problems garnering recognition of its existence despite the universally known fact that it is an independent, free and constitutional democracy and despite almost every country in the world maintaining practical diplomatic relations with Taipei.
This makes the country a member of the international club of nations, and other states also treat it as an important member of that club. They interact with Taiwan on the basis of that recognition, but at official club meetings, Taiwan cannot be officially mentioned.
In other words, Taiwan is already part of the international community but is still trying to find its way to the ticket office. The diplomacy of recognition may be necessary, but it is practical diplomacy that guarantees Taiwan's international interests and international participation.
Second, we should start thinking about how to put an end to diplomatic hostilities with China. Cross-strait relations and diplomatic relations are two sides of the same coin, and the relationship between the two is very clear. China's isolation of Taiwan is intimately linked to its focus on the "one China" policy -- in the past the goal was to promote unification, but now it is to prevent Taiwanese independence.
The unavoidable challenge for Taiwan is therefore to find ways to use the cross-strait relationship and its China policy to make Beijing agree to a diplomatic ceasefire.
Of course, cross-strait relations and diplomatic relations do not counterbalance each other, nor can we choose one or the other. The cross-strait relationship will not remain frozen forever and Taiwan's number of diplomatic allies must not fall into the single digits, so finding a balance between the two is a big challenge.
There is no coordination between China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its agency for relations across the Taiwan Strait, which is why Chad severed its diplomatic ties with Taiwan not long before China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Chen Yunlin (
Clearly, cross-strait and diplomatic relations must be coordinated based on overall strategy and policy considerations. A diplomatic ceasefire or a tacit agreement could be achieved by engaging in direct dialogue with Beijing or Washington.
Third, we mustbe closely engaged with the current trend toward the globalization and democratization of international affairs, and engage in comprehensive and meaningful diplomatic activities. No matter what kind of diplomatic activity the country engages in -- be it humanitarian, non-governmental, academic, environmental, human rights or trade diplomacy -- it should be carried out through direct international participation and multi-lateral exchanges, to help widen Taiwan's international ties.
An excessive emphasis on diplomatic recognition has made the country ignore its responsibilities and obligations in the international community. This has resulted in Taiwan concentrating its diplomatic resources on keeping the number of diplomatic allies high, thereby creating a situation where the allies raise unreasonable demands.
Taiwan expends much less of its resources on international participation and diplomacy than other nations. International aid and humanitarian and human rights assistance are all areas where efforts can be stepped up.
Philip Yang is a professor in the department of political science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS