On the eve of Premier Su Tseng-chang's (蘇貞昌) visit to Chad, the African nation broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Behind this was the black hand of China. This episode makes it clear that despite Su's revision of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁 ) policies, China still isn't satisfied, as what it really want is someone to completely sell out the nation the way former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) did last year.
Judging by China's foreign relations in recent years, it hasn't just been trying to cope with the "Taiwan issue" -- its overall policy has been to broaden and entrench an international anti-US front.
While everyone was focused on North Korea's missile launch and its connection with China, foreign Chinese-language media and South Korean media have been helping Beijing by trying to put some distance between China and North Korea. One Hong Kong media outlet had a special report claiming that there was a deep rift between China and North Korea, and that the two have different intentions. Is this really the case?
The report said that China was not given forewarning of the North Korean missile launch. This is what China itself says. The Chinese Communist Party has been lying since its founding, and anyone who believes it in this particular case has been duped. As for North Korean leader Kim Jong-il's refusal to meet with a representative from China, this is clearly an act put on for the US.
The Hong Kong report also said that China proposed sanctions against North Korea in the UN. This just wrong. China was opposed to sanctions, and only made a verbal condemnation that lacked any binding commitment. It says that North Korea may have the ability to print counterfeit Chinese money, but as of yet there is no evidence that the regime has done so.
Yet when counterfeit US money was found in Macau more than 10 years ago, the Yazhou Zhoukan weekly magazine reported that China had prevented the Macau government from making a thorough investigation.
The magazine report went on to say that the Bank of China had agreed to US requests to freeze North Korean accounts in its Macau branches. This was supposed to have happened last year, but no one is sure if it has or not. However, China has allowed North Korea to relocate its Macau office to the city of Zhuhai in Guangdong Province. Since Macau's international casinos make it a suitable place for the CIA to operate, moving to Guangdong put the North Koreans under direct Chinese protection.
If there really has been a rift in the relationship between China and North Korea, why doesn't China simply expel the North Koreans? Furthermore, even though China may have frozen North Korean accounts, China's President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) visited North Korea last November to give US$2 billion in aid. In a word, China is still opposing the US and supporting Kim's regime.
When China, Russia and four other former Soviet states established the Shanghai Co-operation Organization (SCO) in June 2001, it was intended to be a check on US influence. After years of work, it had a major breakthrough in June. Not only did it invite Mongolia, Pakistan and India to attend as observers -- the heads of state attended from all countries except India -- but it also invited the US' sworn enemy, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is believed to be developing nuclear weapons, has advocated that Israel be wiped off the face of the map and has helped stir up the conflict in Lebanon.
Ahmadinejad was the focus of media attention in Shanghai, and now the SCO is seen as an Asian Warsaw Pact. Following the collapse of the eastern European Warsaw Pact, China has gathered together former communist countries and terrorists to oppose Western democracies headed by the US, the most prominent democracy.
US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Christopher Hill testified to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the Iranian government dispatched at least one person to North Korea to observe the missile launch. It is evident that this Asian Warsaw Pact extends from the Middle East to East Asia, linking Iran with North Korea.
This group has a broader spectrum of participants than the the socialist members of the original Warsaw Pact, and poses a more serious anti-US nuclear threat. Under these conditions, how can the US please the communist party by short-sightedly encouraging Taiwan to accept China's "united front" strategy disguised as an exchange?
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Marc Langer
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS