The gathering of Asians and Americans, all experienced in dealing with trans-Pacific issues, quickly zeroed in on a basic obstacle to better relations between nations of this region. At an East-West Center seminar in Hawaii, Americans and Asians alike pointed to Washington.
"The atmosphere in Washington is the worst in the memory of anyone now alive," said James Kelly, who as an assistant secretary of state headed the East Asia division of that department during President George W. Bush's first term.
"The inattention to Asia is unfortunate but probably natural," Kelly said, referring to the demands of the war in Iraq, the conflagration between Israel and Hezbollah terrorists and attempts to contain the nuclear ambitions of Iran.
"There is an insufficient realization that Asia has become the center of gravity," he said, meaning the focal point of political, economic and military power with which the US must cope.
"Policy and strategy toward East Asia," he said, "are not easy to discern."
Stephen Bosworth, a former US ambassador to the Philippines and South Korea, chimed in.
"The administration can't deal with more than one or two issues at a time," he said. "There just isn't enough time in a day or enough energy."
Bosworth, now dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University near Boston, added: "The inattention of Washington may not be reversible in a couple of years because it is so absorbed with Iraq, Iran and the Middle East."
Instead, he thought the US would be in a holding pattern until 2009, when a new president will take office after the election of November 2008.
Meantime, Bosworth said, the foundations of power in Asia "will have shifted while we were not paying attention. By 2009, the context will have shifted."
Kelly took that thought a step further: "Even in 2009, we don't know if the US will take a better direction."
A Chinese perspective came from Jin Canrong (金燦榮) of the People's University of China, who said his government had "rather low" expectations of the remaining years of the Bush administration.
"There is nothing we really want from Sino-US relations," he said.
Similarly, the press secretary of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, Shaukat Sultan Khan, said: "One cannot expect miracles in the last two years" of Bush's term of office.
He expressed concern that Bush would use force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear arms, a conflict that would spill into Pakistan.
A senior member of Vietnam's National Assembly, Ton Nu Thi Ninh, applauded veterans of both the US and Vietnam for leading a reconciliation between her nation and the US.
Even so, she said, "Vietnam is low in US priorities; Vietnam has no illusions about that."
To encourage candor, none of the 34 political leaders, government officials, diplomats, military officers, academics, think tank people, business executives or journalists at the seminar could normally be quoted. Kelly, whose home is in Honolulu, and Bosworth, however, gave permission to be quoted. Jin, Khan and Ninh spoke at a public luncheon later.
A Southeast Asian participant suggested there was an exception to Washington's inattention to Asia, which was "an obsession with China" that reduced Washington's consideration of other issues to how they would affect relations with China.
Kelly and Bosworth agreed.
"China is a potential new hegemon in Asia. Its economy and dynamic diplomacy affect all in the region. But there is a willingness to have the US play a role there. We are not being forced out," Kelly said.
A military officer said the US Pacific Command sought to expand its engagement with the People's Liberation Army to work out agreements that would prescribe the behavior of US and Chinese forces when close to one another.
The US and Russia have such an agreement intended to prevent hostile incidents at sea, but the Chinese have resisted that approach.
Several Asian participants urged the US to engage the public in Asian democracies.
One national legislator said: "The US should look at the publics of other democracies as if they were your own constituents. If you do, you might be able to overcome the anti-American feelings in some nations."
In the end, however, Kelly was not optimistic about the administration's interest in forging a fresh policy toward Asia.
"Asia is not waiting for word from Washington," he said, "but is moving ahead."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS