Taiwan's democracy and identity are serious topics that touch on the nation's very existence.
Two recent events have caught the attention of the Taiwanese public. First, the premiere of a documentary entitled Taiwan's Road to Democracy caused a sensation among the nation's pro-localization forces. The second event was the second signature drive by a group of pan-green academics, which focused on democracy and identity in an attempt to review the govern-ment's performance and the maturity of Taiwan's civil society.
Both events dealt with the same subject matter from different perspectives. The documentary praises the nation's democratic achievements between 1988 and 2000, claiming that Taiwan has won international acclaim for transforming itself from an authoritarian society into a democracy through a peaceful revolution. It also reminds the Taiwanese to defy hardship and danger and launch the next stage of democratization.
The signature drive launched by the pro-green academics highlighted their frustration and disappointment with the stalled process of democratization that has resulted from the country's identity crisis, and asked the public to consider how to enrich Taiwan's national identity through democratic values.
The documentary reflects every crucial event and turning point in the nation's pursuit of democracy and how, for every step toward democracy, Taiwan has further clarified its relationship with China. It also shows how this has led to a clearer understanding of what Taiwan is and who we are, and how democratization had led to localization and the formation of a Taiwanese identity.
This culminated in former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) proposal of a "special state-to-state" formula to define cross-strait relations and the transfer of power to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in 2000.
However, following the DPP's ascent to power, the nation's democracy has been dealt a series of blows as a result of the conflict between the pan-green and pan-blue camps. The opposition-dominated legislature has rendered ineffective the popularly elected government's attempt to implement policy, while Taiwanese identity has been eroded as a result of the economic attraction of China, the influence of Taiwan's China-leaning politicians and parties and a wavering government.
Taiwan has temporarily lost its confidence and a sense of direction to guide its future development. When contemplating a solution, the government should set the agenda it intends to follow in the next stage of democratization and kick-start that stage to focus and strengthen national awareness among the public.
During the first stage of democratization, a conference on national affairs was convened, the "Communist rebellion" era was ended, the Constitution was reinstated and lifetime employment for legislators and National Assembly members was ended. The Constitution has been amended six times. We now have full legislative and direct presidential elections. Over the past 12 years, every move that Taiwan has made has been intended to help the nation grow stronger and become a normal country.
For Taiwanese identity to be further deepened, the Taiwanese people must have confidence. The question of how the government should go about enhancing the nation's performance on the political, economic and cultural fronts in order to build confidence among the Taiwanese thus becomes crucial to building national identity.
There is no denying that China's rapid cultural and economic rise on the international stage in recent years has led to a growing sense of inferiority and China-leaning attitudes among the Taiwanese public. According to a survey conducted by the Chinese-language magazine Global Views Monthly, China, trailing only Japan and the US, is the country that Taiwanese admire the most.
In this survey, South Korea, one of the four Asian tigers, is ranked fourth. With their tremendous confidence in their country, the South Koreans have fared better than Taiwan on the economic and cultural fronts.
The most urgent task the government is facing in its policy implementation now is building confidence among the public and making them proud to be Taiwanese.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS