A 15-year-old girl hides her pregnancy from her family and gives birth to a stillborn infant, then throws the corpse out the window of a high-rise apartment, hoping that no one will know it is hers. But she is caught -- and sentenced to nine months in detention for attempting to "conceal a birth."
This tragic tale comes from Hong Kong, not Taiwan, and for that we can be grateful. The tortured logic in the verdicts of some of Taiwan's judges can seem bizarre at times, but it is surely unlikely -- even with the sexism that remains in the nation's judiciary -- that a decision as overtly misogynist and despicable as the Hong Kong court handed down this week would be replicated here. It would appear Taiwan's feminist movement is sufficiently broad such that at least some within it would stand up for a child who should be treated with sympathy and care -- not the murderer of a human being that did not die by her hand.
The Hong Kong case -- with its overtones of state ownership of the womb -- serves as a timely counterpoint to the latest feeble calls by Taiwanese officials for young women to have more babies.
Over the years health authorities have expressed concern over the steady increase in the average marrying age and declining birth rates, as if these represented a lack of filial piety on the part of the woman. But these are features of a society that is becoming more wealthy, better educated and more individualistic; in short, a society in which women take more control over their lives and have the ability to choose when to start a family and with whom.
The result of such empowerment is the acceleration of the graying of society, though there are other factors that contribute to this, such as improved and universal healthcare. Faced with the long-term challenge of an elderly demographic with fewer adult children and less money to care for it, governments the world over have responded by appealing to the maternal instincts of women who would rather be doing other things. This is, needless to say, pointless.
The challenge is to turn pregnancy into an opportunity and a thing to be celebrated for would-be mothers of all ages. But there is a lot more to achieving this than sprouting platitudes about service to the nation. For health officials or anyone else to suggest that all it takes to kick-start population growth is an appeal to a nascent nationalism that few young people today feel is absurd -- and futile.
In a country that is making the raising of children more burdensome by tolerating outrageous educational expenses and expectations -- in addition to traditional family pressures -- is it any wonder that young urban women are turning their backs on marriage and family in increasing numbers? How also are young women to support their families if their young husbands are stuck doing military service on a pauper's salary? How can professional women be encouraged to have children when the law offers perfunctory maternity leave and little job protection? And how can any woman think she is being treated like a patriot in the absence of daycare subsidies?
Without any long-term incentive strategy in place, and short of implementing an authentic immigration scheme, the current graying trend will continue. Tragically, the terminated pregnancies that would otherwise help fill the gap could be avoided if only women were given practical means to prosper as mothers and to fend off the bigotry of those who prefer them to stay indoors.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS