A number of signs have arisen from the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development that took place on July 27 and 28. These signs highlighted the ongoing loss of national identity in Taiwan today. At a symposium of the conference's cross-strait task force, a representative of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople slammed the government, and referred to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) as "Comrade Hu Jintao."
Although he, in embarrassment, corrected his slip of the tongue, the episode highlights that China-based Taiwanese businesspeople have accepted and integrated China's political dogma into their lives and thinking. The longer they live in China, the more assimilated they become. This is just human nature and there is nothing strange about it.
The problem is that there is a huge difference in population, territory, and political power between Taiwan and China. China therefore normally holds the upper hand in the process of cross-strait integration, while China-based Taiwanese businesspeople are just a disadvantaged group being subjugated by China.
China, of course, has made good use of this advantage. Several years ago, it systematically organized Taiwanese businesspeople and helped them establish associations in various Chinese cities. This lies at the very heart of China's strategy to apply political pressure through business to help achieve its goal of unification.
The phrase "Comrade Hu Jintao" that was unintentionally repeated in Taipei is a standard expression among Taiwanese businesspeople in China. As long as the government continues to push for opening up toward China, it won't be many years before the phrase is no longer considered a slip-up in Taiwan, but rather becomes necessary for Taiwanese businesspeople when expressing their loyalty to Beijing.
During the Period of Communist Rebellion, investing in China was equated with funding the enemy and was punishable by death, but just a dozen or so years later, everything has changed. Today, these Taiwanese businesspeople can come back to Taiwan to participate in the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development, and ask in public, "Who doesn't love Taiwan?"
This national identity crisis also appeared in another meeting related to the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development. In order to placate Chinese tourists who visit Taiwan, the National Association of Travel Agents requested that the government accept the yuan as "semi-official national currency" and allow free New Taiwan dollar-Chinese yuan exchanges.
Later, the association said that the request was simply a typo, but that does not sound very persuasive. In fact, this was not the first time Taiwan's tourist industry has trampled on national dignity.
Last year, 4.1 million Taiwanese tourists visited China, but the Taiwanese flag never flew at the hotels where they stayed. A few days ago, however, TV reports showed Chinese tourists cruising on Sun Moon Lake (
But there are a thousand ways to promote one's business, and there is no need for Taiwanese to attract business by belittling themselves as if they were Chinese slaves. Now that we've seen Chinese flags flying on Taiwan's soil, it is not surprising to hear talk of the yuan becoming semi-official national currency.
The only difference is that the former is simply a matter of commercial hype, while the latter involves damaging national identity. The idea of treating the yuan as semi-official national currency is no different from endorsing the belief that China is an ally or even our motherland.
Of course, we can regard this thinking as a "temporary delusion," but this could well be the beginning of a permanent delusion. If it gets worse, it could be the prelude to the nation's ruin.
Will Taiwan perish? Don't underestimate the severity of the deeper crisis that lies behind the thinking that would request the yuan be considered a semi-official national currency, or the choice of a phrase like "Comrade Hu Jintao." If the government doesn't change its policies of "active opening," "effective opening," or "confident opening," the confusion regarding national identity will deepen as cross-strait economic integration continues.
When the delusion that China is our motherland becomes normal, and the normalcy -- that Taiwan is the motherland -- is regarded as delusion, that will be when Taiwan perishes.
Don't discard this warning as nonsense or simply trying to raise a fuss. The crisis is near at hand.
Take this conference as an example: While it should discuss sustainable economic development for Taiwan and while Taiwan's dependence on China is already unbelievably high -- 71 percent of Taiwan's foreign investment goes there, accumulated Taiwanese investment in China has reached US$300 billion, and the production value of Taiwanese businesses in China last year equaled Taiwan's GDP -- the cross-strait task force only discussed how to further open up Taiwan to China.
If the government's lack of understanding of the facts is not an example of confusion, then what is?
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS