The phrase "rat running across the street" (
Chen obviously has more than his share of faults and really has no one to blame for all this but himself. However, it has got to the point that so many people want to jump onto the bandwagon to bring him down that there just isn't enough sensational dirt to go around. After unsuccessful attempts to raise public interest in their crusade, the anti-Chen accusers are becoming more and more frivolous -- the latest and perhaps most absurd accusation forcing an investigation into the receipts used to claim reimbursement from a Presidential Office expense fund.
No one doubts that it is wrong both legally and ethically to be reimbursed for an expense that one doesn't incur or to which one is not entitled. However, if you seek to take the high moral ground, there is no stopping your enemy from trying to outbid you and demanding even higher standards. The truth of the matter is that the practice of getting cash reimbursements with forged receipts is so common in Taiwan -- especially among members of the Legislative Yuan -- that whoever hurled the first stone against Chen for irregularities in receipt reimbursements has inadvertently given his enemies a lot of ammunition.
Therefore, it was not surprising that almost immediately after the probe into the "receipt scandal" began, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers began to question Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
This is not to mention that the so-called "irregularity" associated with expense reimbursements in the Presidential Office derives from a lack of details in the receipts submitted. The Presidential Office has claimed that the details of the spending cannot be disclosed on confidentiality grounds. It is not going to be easy to refute that argument. While the general public demands a lot more transparency from the Presidential Office and often places it under close scrutiny for highly justified reasons, it has to be admitted that some degree of confidentiality is necessary for at least some spending. At the very least, a gray area exists regarding what kind and level of disclosure should be expected from the Presidential Office.
One question that the general public -- and surely the DPP -- is likely to ask is why didn't the Ministry of Audit catch this mistake or irregularity in the past? According to the Presidential Office, its practice was no different in previous years and no one ever said a thing. Does that mean the Ministry of Audit has not faithfully fulfilled its duties in the past, both during Chen's presidency and the reign of his predecessors?
In the weeks to come, it can be expected that this morality campaign is likely to reach new heights. DPP lawmakers have already condemned Ma for the impropriety of some KMT lawmakers in drinking at a hostess club in China. We can safely assume that Taiwan's "moral majority" can see through all this.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS